Back to Search
Start Over
Adequacy, fairness and sustainability of pay-as-you-go-pension-systems: defined benefit versus defined contribution
- Source :
- European Journal of Finance, The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 24, no.13, p. 1100-1122 (2017)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- There are three main challenges facing public pension systems. First, pension systems need to provide an adequate income for pensioners in the retirement phase. Second, participants wish a fair level of benefits in relation to the contributions paid. Last but no least, the pension system would need to be financially sustainable in the long run. In this paper, we analyse defined benefit versus defined contribution schemes in terms of adequacy, fairness and sustainability jointly. Also, risk sharing mechanisms, that involve changes in the key variables of the system, are designed to restore the financial sustainability at the same time that we study their consequences on the adequacy and fairness of the system.
- Subjects :
- Wage curve
Relation (database)
Pay as you go
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
fairness
01 natural sciences
Phase (combat)
010104 statistics & probability
0502 economics and business
Public pension
Economics
050207 economics
0101 mathematics
Consumption (economics)
adequacy
Pension
050208 finance
Equity (economics)
Actuarial science
05 social sciences
sustainability
public pensions
Sustainability
Financial sustainability
Key (cryptography)
Business
risks
pay-as-you-go
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Journal of Finance, The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 24, no.13, p. 1100-1122 (2017)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ff6856b7ea79512173ba2151b6631022