Back to Search
Start Over
Perception of front-of-pack labels according to social characteristics, nutritional knowledge and food purchasing habits
- Source :
- Public Health Nutr, Public Health Nutrition, Public Health Nutrition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2013, 16 (3), pp.392-402. ⟨10.1017/S1368980012003515⟩, Public Health Nutrition, 2013, 16 (3), pp.392-402. ⟨10.1017/S1368980012003515⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2012
- Publisher :
- Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2012.
-
Abstract
- ObjectiveTo identify patterns of perception of front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels and to determine social factors, nutritional knowledge and attention to packaging features related to such patterns.DesignCross-sectional. Perception was measured using indicators of understanding and acceptability of three simple FOP labels (the ‘Green Tick’, the logo of the French Nutrition and Health Programme (PNNS logo) and ‘simple traffic lights’ (STL)) and two detailed formats (‘multiple traffic lights’ (MTL) and the ‘colour range’ logo (CR)). Associations of perception patterns with individual characteristics were examined using χ2 tests.SettingData from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort study.SubjectsA total of 38 763 adults.ResultsFour perception patterns emerged. Poorly educated individuals were most often found in groups favouring simple formats. The ‘favourable to CR’ group had a high rate of men and older persons. Poor nutritional knowledge was more frequent in the ‘favourable to STL’ group, while individuals with substantial knowledge were proportionally more numerous in the ‘favourable to MTL’ group. The ‘favourable to STL’ group more frequently self-reported noting price and marketing characteristics during purchasing, while the ‘favourable to MTL’ and ‘favourable to CR’ groups declared more interest in nutritional information. The ‘favourable to Green Tick and PNNS logo’ group self-reported paying closer attention to claims and quality guarantee labels.ConclusionsThe ‘favourable to MTL’ cluster was most frequently represented in our survey. However, simple FOP formats may be most appropriate for increasing awareness of healthy eating among targeted groups with poor nutritional knowledge and little interest in the nutritional quality of packaged foods.
- Subjects :
- Male
AUSTRALIA
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
IMPACT
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
NEW-ZEALAND
CONSUMERS
HOT TOPIC – Nutrition labelling
Medicine (miscellaneous)
DETERMINANTS
Purchasing habits
Nutritional information
Developmental psychology
Cohort Studies
Food Labeling
DIETARY-INTAKE
PROGRAM
Medicine
media_common
Nutrition and Dietetics
Age Factors
Commerce
Middle Aged
CHOICE
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]
Nutrition labelling
Front-of-pack label
Educational Status
Female
HEALTH
France
Comprehension
Cohort study
Adult
Adolescent
media_common.quotation_subject
Logo
Nutrition facts label
Food Preferences
Young Adult
Sex Factors
Perception
Nutrition knowledge
Humans
Quality (business)
Consumer behaviour
Aged
business.industry
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Feeding Behavior
Consumer Behavior
Purchasing
FORMATS
Diet
Cross-Sectional Studies
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14752727 and 13689800
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Public Health Nutrition
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ff640cf013017cebc6a5ca478d14eb64
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980012003515