Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of the terminal ileum in Crohn’s disease patients

Authors :
Jeroen A. W. Tielbeek
Karin Horsthuis
Carl A. J. Puylaert
Jaap Stoker
C. Yung Nio
Frans M. Vos
Peter J. Schüffler
Cyriel Y. Ponsioen
Banafsche Mearadji
Radiology and nuclear medicine
Graduate School
AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition
AGEM - Re-generation and cancer of the digestive system
ACS - Microcirculation
AGEM - Digestive immunity
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neurovascular Disorders
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Source :
Abdominal Radiology, 44 (2), Abdominal radiology (New York), 44(2), 398-405. Springer New York, Abdominal Radiology, Puylaert, C A J, Tielbeek, J A W, Schüffler, P J, Nio, C Y, Horsthuis, K, Mearadji, B, Ponsioen, C Y, Vos, F M & Stoker, J 2019, ' Comparison of contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI in assessment of the terminal ileum in Crohn's disease patients ', Abdominal radiology (New York), vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 398-405 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1734-6, ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 44(2), 398-405
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the performance of contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DW)-MRI in grading Crohn’s disease activity of the terminal ileum. Methods Three readers evaluated CE-MRI, DW-MRI, and their combinations (CE/DW-MRI and DW/CE-MRI, depending on which protocol was used at the start of evaluation). Disease severity grading scores were correlated to the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS). Diagnostic accuracy, severity grading, and levels of confidence were compared between imaging protocols and interobserver agreement was calculated. Results Sixty-one patients were included (30 female, median age 36). Diagnostic accuracy for active disease for CE-MRI, DW-MRI, CE/DW-MRI, and DW/CE-MRI ranged between 0.82 and 0.85, 0.75 and 0.83, 0.79 and 0.84, and 0.74 and 0.82, respectively. Severity grading correlation to CDEIS ranged between 0.70 and 0.74, 0.66 and 0.70, 0.69 and 0.75, and 0.67 and 0.74, respectively. For each reader, CE-MRI values were consistently higher than DW-MRI, albeit not significantly. Confidence levels for all readers were significantly higher for CE-MRI compared to DW-MRI (P<br />Abdominal Radiology, 44 (2)<br />ISSN:2366-004X<br />ISSN:2366-0058

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2366004X and 23660058
Volume :
44
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ff372b9bffd2cb951e350da290cc2f83