Back to Search
Start Over
Clinimetric Properties of Self-reported Disability Scales for Whiplash: A Systematic Review for the Whiplash Core Outcome Set (CATWAD)
- Source :
- Griffin, A R, Leaver, A M, Arora, M, Walton, D M, Peek, A, Bandong, A N, Sterling, M, Rebbeck, T & CATWAD co-authors 2021, ' Clinimetric Properties of Self-reported Disability Scales for Whiplash: A Systematic Review for the Whiplash Core Outcome Set (CATWAD) ', The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 37, no. 10, 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000968, pp. 766-787 . https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000968, Griffin, A R, Leaver, A M, Arora, M, Walton, D M, Peek, A, Bandong, A N, Sterling, M, Rebbeck, T, CATWAD co-authors & Kasch, H 2021, ' Clinimetric Properties of Self-reported Disability Scales for Whiplash : A Systematic Review for the Whiplash Core Outcome Set (CATWAD) ', Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 766-787 . https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000968
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objectives: A core outcomes set (COS) for whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) has been proposed to improve consistency of outcome reporting in clinical trials. Patient-reported disability was one outcome of interest within this COS. The aim of this review was to identify the most suitable tools for measuring self-reported disability in WAD based on clinimetric performance. Methods: Database searches took place in 2 stages. The first identified outcome measures used to assess self-reported disability in WAD, and the second identified studies assessing the clinimetric properties of these outcome measures in WAD. Data on the study, population and outcome measure characteristics were extracted, along with clinimetric data. Quality and clinimetric performance were assessed in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Results: Of 19,663 records identified in stage 1 searches, 32 were retained following stage 2 searches and screening. Both the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index performed well in reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.84 to 0.98), construct validity (74% to 82% of hypotheses accepted), and responsiveness (majority of correlations in accordance with hypotheses). Both received Category B recommendations due to a lack of evidence for content validity. Discussion: This review identified the Neck Disability Index and Whiplash Disability Questionnaire as the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing self-reported disability in WAD based on moderate to high-quality evidence for sufficient reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. However, the content validity of these PROMs has yet to be established in WAD, and until this is undertaken, it is not possible to recommend 1 PROM over the other for inclusion in the WAD COS.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Inclusion (disability rights)
Intraclass correlation
Population
MEDLINE
patient outcome assessment
patient-reported outcome
Surveys and Questionnaires
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Content validity
medicine
Whiplash
Humans
education
patient-reported outcome measures
Reliability (statistics)
Whiplash Injuries
education.field_of_study
business.industry
Construct validity
Reproducibility of Results
research design
medicine.disease
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Physical therapy
Neurology (clinical)
Self Report
business
whiplash injuries
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15365409
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Clinical journal of pain
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ff0ab19e3121bce8799b965ae12dfeaf
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000968