Outcomes of redo‐isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left‐sided valve surgery

Objectives To compare early and long-term outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid surgery (RITS) after left-sided valve surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent RITS for severe tricuspid regurgitation after previous left-sided valve surgery from January 1999 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: RITS by median sternotomy (m-RITS; n = 78) and totally endoscopic approach (e-RITS; n = 95). Perioperative outcomes and follow-up results were analyzed. Results There were 19 (11%) in-hospital deaths (14.1% in m-RITS and 8.4% in e-RITS, p = .234) that decreased from 16.7% (1999-2014) to 6.9% (2015-2019) (p = .044). Tricuspid valve replacement (odds ratio [OR] = 4.989, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.133-29.790, p = .041) and NYHA function class IV (OR = 9.611, 95% CI: 2.102-43.954, p = .004) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 97.2% (95% CI: 94.5%-99.9%), 80.3% (95% CI: 71.7%-88.9%), 59.2% (95% CI: 43.5%-75.5%), and 49.3% (95% CI: 27.2%-71.4%), respectively. Conclusion Patients undergoing RITS carry a high risk of early mortality. There was no significant difference in early mortality or long-term survival between the endoscopy and median sternotomy, whereas the endoscopy approach was associated with shorter intensive care unit stays and fewer reoperations. Repair resulted in lower surgical mortality than replacement with acceptable residual tricuspid regurgitation.