Back to Search Start Over

Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements

Authors :
Martin J. Graves
Beat Werner
Marijn P. Rolf
Juerg Schwitter
Matthias A Dieringer
Philip J. Kilner
John J. Totman
Peter D. Gatehouse
Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Rebecca A. Quest
Yingmin Liu
David N. Firmin
Massimo Lombardi
Mark B.M. Hofman
Jochen von Spiczak
Albert C. van Rossum
University of Zurich
Physics and medical technology
Cardiology
ICaR - Heartfailure and pulmonary arterial hypertension
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Gatehouse, P D, Rolf, M P, Graves, M J, Hofman, M B M, Totman, J, Werner, B, Quest, R A, Liu, Y M, von Spiczak, J, Dieringer, M, Firmin, D N, van Rossum, A C, Lombardi, M, Schwitter, J, Schulz-Menger, J & Kilner, P J 2010, ' Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements ', Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 12, 5 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 5 (2010), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 12:5. BioMed Central, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 12
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
BioMed Central, 2010.

Abstract

Aims Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive phase contrast measurements of flow through planes transecting large vessels. However, some clinically valuable applications are highly sensitive to errors caused by small offsets of measured velocities if these are not adequately corrected, for example by the use of static tissue or static phantom correction of the offset error. We studied the severity of uncorrected velocity offset errors across sites and CMR systems. Methods and Results In a multi-centre, multi-vendor study, breath-hold through-plane retrospectively ECG-gated phase contrast acquisitions, as are used clinically for aortic and pulmonary flow measurement, were applied to static gelatin phantoms in twelve 1.5 T CMR systems, using a velocity encoding range of 150 cm/s. No post-processing corrections of offsets were implemented. The greatest uncorrected velocity offset, taken as an average over a 'great vessel' region (30 mm diameter) located up to 70 mm in-plane distance from the magnet isocenter, ranged from 0.4 cm/s to 4.9 cm/s. It averaged 2.7 cm/s over all the planes and systems. By theoretical calculation, a velocity offset error of 0.6 cm/s (representing just 0.4% of a 150 cm/s velocity encoding range) is barely acceptable, potentially causing about 5% miscalculation of cardiac output and up to 10% error in shunt measurement. Conclusion In the absence of hardware or software upgrades able to reduce phase offset errors, all the systems tested appeared to require post-acquisition correction to achieve consistently reliable breath-hold measurements of flow. The effectiveness of offset correction software will still need testing with respect to clinical flow acquisitions.<br />Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 12<br />ISSN:1097-6647<br />ISSN:1532-429X

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532429X and 10976647
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....fe5a7cee5fe77449471951a189725f25
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-5