Back to Search Start Over

Nutritional Recovery after Open and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Comparative Trial (CCOG1204)

Authors :
Toyohisa Yaguchi
Yuichi Ito
Mitsuro Kanda
Kenta Murotani
Yasuhiro Kodera
Chie Tanaka
Kiyoshi Ishigure
Yoshinari Mochizuki
Michitaka Fujiwara
Jin Teramoto
Kazunari Misawa
Seiji Ito
Hiroshi Nakayama
Yoshihisa Kawase
Hidenobu Matsushita
Source :
Digestive Surgery. 35:11-18
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
S. Karger AG, 2017.

Abstract

Background: Little information from prospective clinical trials is available on the influences of surgical approaches on postoperative body compositions and nutritional status. We designed a prospective non-randomized trial to compare postoperative chronological changes in body composition and nutritional status between laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer (GC). Methods: Body compositions and nutritional indicators in blood tests were measured at the baseline and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative months (POM). The primary end point was the decrease relative to the baseline in the body muscle mass at POM 6. Results: Ninety-six patients for the laparoscopic group and 52 for the open group were eligible for data analysis. No significant differences were found in any baseline demographics, body compositions, and nutritional indicators between the groups. The changes of body muscle mass at POM 6 were similar in both groups. Overall, no significant differences between the groups were observed in any of the body composition and nutritional indicators during the first year after surgery. Conclusions: Postoperative body compositions and nutritional status were not affected by surgical approaches during the first 12 months after surgery in patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for stage I GC.

Details

ISSN :
14219883 and 02534886
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digestive Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....fcc4fe0d564d4546373ac62c7f56b78f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000458714