Back to Search Start Over

Machine Learning for Surgical Phase Recognition

Authors :
Sebastian Bodenstedt
Stefanie Speidel
Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
Martin Wagner
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Carly R. Garrow
Mona W. Schmidt
Sandy Engelhardt
Daniel A. Hashimoto
Hannes Kenngott
Linhong Li
Felix Nickel
Source :
Annals of Surgery. 273:684-693
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2020.

Abstract

Objective To provide an overview of ML models and data streams utilized for automated surgical phase recognition. Background Phase recognition identifies different steps and phases of an operation. ML is an evolving technology that allows analysis and interpretation of huge data sets. Automation of phase recognition based on data inputs is essential for optimization of workflow, surgical training, intraoperative assistance, patient safety, and efficiency. Methods A systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane recommendations and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. PubMed, Web of Science, IEEExplore, GoogleScholar, and CiteSeerX were searched. Literature describing phase recognition based on ML models and the capture of intraoperative signals during general surgery procedures was included. Results A total of 2254 titles/abstracts were screened, and 35 full-texts were included. Most commonly used ML models were Hidden Markov Models and Artificial Neural Networks with a trend towards higher complexity over time. Most frequently used data types were feature learning from surgical videos and manual annotation of instrument use. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was used most commonly, often achieving accuracy rates over 90%, though there was no consistent standardization of defined phases. Conclusions ML for surgical phase recognition can be performed with high accuracy, depending on the model, data type, and complexity of surgery. Different intraoperative data inputs such as video and instrument type can successfully be used. Most ML models still require significant amounts of manual expert annotations for training. The ML models may drive surgical workflow towards standardization, efficiency, and objectiveness to improve patient outcome in the future. Registration prospero CRD42018108907.

Details

ISSN :
15281140 and 00034932
Volume :
273
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....fc9498088badb2b469a3aa838911f75a