Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nab‐paclitaxel for borderline resectable pancreatic cancers: Intention‐to‐treat analysis compared with upfront surgery

Background/purpose We evaluated efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GNP-NAT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BR-PC) patients compared to conventional upfront surgery (UPS). Methods This single-center retrospective study assessed 151 consecutive patients: 96 diagnosed in 2008-2014 underwent UPS (UPS group) and 55 diagnosed in 2015-2017 underwent GNP-NAT (GN group). Patient background, surgical, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results Age, sex, and pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were similar between groups. After four courses of NAT-GNP, 46 GN patients (84%) underwent surgery while all UPS patients underwent surgery. Only three GN patients (5%) underwent non-therapeutic procedures, compared to 23 (24%) in the UPS group (P = .004). In the whole cohort, R0-resection was achieved in 40 GN patients (73%) vs 46 UPS patients (48%; P = .004) and the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the GN group (median survival time, 31.9 vs 18.1 months, P = .014). In the resection cohort, the R0-resection rate was 93% (GN) vs 63% (UPS; P = .0007). There was no 90-day mortalities in either group. Conclusions Intention-to-treat-based analysis indicated considerable benefits of GNP-NAT in BR-PCs for long-term survival, contributing to improved tumor suppression and patient selection.