Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of the treatment efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent hemodialysis in patients with acute kidney injury admitted to the intensive care unit
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- Cureus Inc., 2022.
-
Abstract
- WOS:000758928100011 PMID: 35242474 Abstract Introduction and aim Acute kidney injury (AKI) is part of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill patients and is a common condition in intensive care units (ICUs). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for AKI in critically ill patients. This patient population has a high mortality rate despite RRT. There are two methods of RRT for patients in ICUs: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Both CRRT and IHD similarly provide adequate metabolic control. We aimed to compare these two RRT modalities in terms of ICU stay, mortality, and laboratory recovery in these patients with high mortality. Materials and methods A total of 120 patients with AKI who needed RRT in the ICU were included in the study (CRRT, n:40; IHD, n:80). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II scores at the time of admission to the ICU were calculated. Mean arterial pressure, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, pH, lactate, and bicarbonate levels were measured before and after dialysis. Patients were classified as living and deceased. Factors affecting the length of stay in the intensive care unit and 30-day mortality were evaluated. The variability in laboratory parameters between groups before and after dialysis was examined. The groups were compared with these parameters. Results Sixty-one point seven percent (61.7%, n:74) of the patients were female. The mean age was 62.90 +/- 13.64 years. At the time of admission to the ICU, the patients' SAPS II score was 45.05 +/- 12.76, APACHE II score was 22.05 +/- 6.32, and SOFA score was 8.26 +/- 2.48. 66.7% (n:80) of the patients included in the study died, and the length of stay of these patients in the ICU was 12.85 +/- 10.23 days. When the groups were compared, SAPS II, APACHE II scores, and SOFA scores were significantly higher in the CRRT group than in the IHD group (p:0.038, p:0.015, p:0.027, respectively). Although the length of stay in the ICU was shorter in the CRRT group, it was not statistically significant (p:0.075). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality (p: 0.891). SAPS-II, APACHE II, and SOFA score affected 30-day mortality while age, gender, and RRT modalities were not associated with mortality. The improvement in laboratory parameters between the pre and post-RRT groups was statistically more significant in the IHD group (p
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00075892
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fae43fc05044a1ad555e21347014c3cd