Back to Search
Start Over
Association of inpatient vs outpatient onset of ST-elevation myocardial infarction with treatment and clinical outcomes
- Source :
- JAMA. 312(19)
- Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Reperfusion times for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occurring in outpatients have improved significantly, but quality improvement efforts have largely ignored STEMI occurring in hospitalized patients (inpatient-onset STEMI).To define the incidence and variables associated with treatment and outcomes of patients who develop STEMI during hospitalization for conditions other than acute coronary syndromes (ACS).Retrospective observational analysis of STEMIs occurring between 2008 and 2011 as identified in the California State Inpatient Database.STEMIs were classified as inpatient onset or outpatient onset based on present-on-admission codes. Patients who had a STEMI after being hospitalized for ACS were excluded from the analysis.Regression models were used to evaluate associations among location of onset of STEMI, resource utilization, and outcomes. Adjustments were made for patient age, sex, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. The analysis allowed for the location of inpatient STEMI to have a multiplicative rather than an additive effect for resource utilization since these measures were highly skewed.A total of 62,021 STEMIs were identified in 303 hospitals, of which 3068 (4.9%) occurred in patients hospitalized for non-ACS indications. Patients with inpatient-onset STEMI were older (mean, 71.5 [SD, 13.5] years vs 64.9 [SD, 14.1] years; P .001) and more frequently female (47.4% vs 32%; P .001) than those with outpatient-onset STEMI. Patients with inpatient-onset STEMI had higher in-hospital mortality (33.6% vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 3.05; 95% CI, 2.76-3.38; P .001), were less likely to be discharged home (33.7% vs 69.4%; AOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.34-0.42; P .001), and were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization (33.8% vs 77.8%; AOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.16-0.21; P .001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (21.6% vs 65%; AOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21-0.26; P .001). Length of stay and inpatient charges were higher for inpatient-onset STEMI (mean length of stay, 13.4 days [95% CI, 12.8-14.0 days] vs 4.7 days [95% CI, 4.6-4.8 days]; adjusted multiplicative effect, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.35-2.69; P .001; mean inpatient charges, $245,000 [95% CI, $235,300-$254,800] vs $129,000 [95% CI, $127,900-$130,100]; adjusted multiplicative effect, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.93-2.28; P .001).Patients who had a STEMI while hospitalized for a non-ACS condition, compared with those with onset of STEMI as an outpatient, were less likely to undergo invasive testing or intervention and had a higher in-hospital mortality rate.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Myocardial Infarction
Comorbidity
Article
California
Cohort Studies
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Internal medicine
Outpatients
Odds Ratio
Medicine
Humans
Myocardial infarction
cardiovascular diseases
Hospital Mortality
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Inpatients
business.industry
Incidence (epidemiology)
Mortality rate
Incidence
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Retrospective cohort study
General Medicine
Odds ratio
Health Care Costs
Health Services
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Hospitalization
surgical procedures, operative
Treatment Outcome
Cardiology
Female
business
Cohort study
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15383598
- Volume :
- 312
- Issue :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JAMA
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fa81de445c7f7f42c24eb42f12b84aeb