Back to Search
Start Over
Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndromes
- Source :
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 70(24)
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background Randomized trial data support the superiority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD). However, whether this benefit is seen in a real-world population among subjects with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. Objectives The main objective of this study was to assess the generalizability of the FREEDOM (Future REvascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Management of Multi-vessel Disease) trial in real-world practice among patients with diabetes mellitus and MV-CAD in residents of British Columbia, Canada. Additionally, the study evaluated the impact of mode of revascularization (CABG vs. PCI with drug-eluting stents) in diabetic patients with ACS and MV-CAD. Methods In a large population-based database from British Columbia, this study evaluated major cardiovascular outcomes in all diabetic patients who underwent coronary revascularization between 2007 and 2014 (n = 4,661, 2,947 patients with ACS). The primary endpoint (major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. The risk of MACCE with CABG or PCI was compared using multivariable adjustment and a propensity score model. Results At 30-days post-revascularization, for ACS patients the odds ratio for MACCE favored CABG 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.71), whereas among SIHD patients MACCE was not affected by revascularization strategy (odds ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.71 to 3.01; pinteraction Conclusions In diabetic patients with MV-CAD, CABG was associated with a lower rate of long-term MACCE relative to PCI for both ACS and SIHD. A well-powered randomized trial of CABG versus PCI in the ACS population is warranted because these patients have been largely excluded from prior trials.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Revascularization
Coronary artery disease
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Postoperative Complications
Internal medicine
medicine
Clinical endpoint
Humans
cardiovascular diseases
030212 general & internal medicine
Myocardial infarction
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Coronary Artery Bypass
education
Aged
Retrospective Studies
education.field_of_study
British Columbia
business.industry
Incidence
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Odds ratio
medicine.disease
Survival Rate
surgical procedures, operative
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Conventional PCI
Cardiology
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15583597
- Volume :
- 70
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fa5eed849333e7224926b165b72fd762