Back to Search
Start Over
Do I care for you or for me? Processing of protected and non-protected moral values in subjects with extreme scores on the Dark Triad
- Source :
- European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience.
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Protected moral values facilitate empathic concern for others, who are exposed to an existential threat, so that one spontaneously helps without taking into account utilitarian cost–benefit considerations. Subjects scoring high on the “Dark Triad” machiavellism, psychopathy, and narcissism are prone to ignore such appeals for selfless help. Until now, data on moral processing and moral decision-making following requests for altruistic help, which directly contrast appeals to protected and non-protected values in subjects with high and low scores on Dark Triad traits, have been missing. In this pilot study 25 healthy subjects with high and 27 with low Dark Triad scores participated in this functional magnetic resonance imaging study. We used a script-driven imagery paradigm to directly contrast requests for selfless help appealing to protected versus non-protected, negotiable moral values. Appeals to protected versus non-protected moral values elicited stronger activations in a large network including insula, amygdala, supramarginal gyrus, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Non-protected values evoked stronger activation in superior frontal sulcus, occipito-temporal junction, and posterior cingulate cortex. During decision-making, high-scorers on the Dark Triad showed increased activations in the superior parietal lobule, precuneus, and intraparietal sulcus. Behaviorally, protected versus non-protected values strongly reduced the reliance on personal cost–benefit calculations in low-scorers, while high-scorers continued to rely on utilitarian deliberations. Data suggest that appeals to protected versus non-protected values activate distinct brain regions associated with strong moral emotions, other-directed cognition, and rule-based decision-making processes. High-scorers display an increased reliance on cost–benefit calculations, which persists even when protected values are threatened.
Details
- ISSN :
- 14338491
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f95fb825adab8b794377ba0f62830687