Back to Search
Start Over
Oesophageal heat exchangers with a diameter of 11mm or 14.7mm are equally effective and safe for targeted temperature management
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 3, p e0173229 (2017), PLoS ONE
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Background Targeted temperature management (TTM) is widely used in critical care settings for conditions including hepatic encephalopathy, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, meningitis, myocardial infarction, paediatric cardiac arrest, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, ischemic stroke and sepsis. Furthermore, TTM is a key treatment for patients after out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest (OHCA). However, the optimal cooling method, which is quick, safe and cost-effective still remains controversial. Since the oesophagus is adjacent to heart and aorta, fast heat-convection to the central blood-stream could be achieved with a minimally invasive oesophageal heat exchanger (OHE). To date, the optimal diameter of an OHE is still unknown. While larger diameters may cause thermal- or pressure-related tissue damage after long-term exposure to the oesophageal wall, smaller diameter (e.g., gastric tubes, up to 11mm) may not provide effective cooling rates. Thus, the objective of the study was to compare OHE-diameters of 11mm (OHE11) and 14.7mm (OHE14.7) and their effects on tissue and cooling capability. Methods Pigs were randomized to OHE11 (N = 8) or OHE14.7 (N = 8). After cooling, pigs were maintained at 33°C for 1 hour. After 10h rewarming, oesophagi were analyzed by means of histopathology. The oesophagus of four animals from a separate study that underwent exactly the identical preparation and cooling protocol described above but received a maintenance period of 24h were used as histopathological controls. Results Mean cooling rates were 2.8±0.4°C°C/h (OHE11) and 3.0±0.3°C °C/h (OHE14.7; p = 0.20). Occasional mild acute inflammatory transepithelial infiltrates were found in the cranial segment of the oesophagus in all groups including controls. Deviations from target temperature were 0.1±0.4°C (OHE11) and 0±0.1°C (OHE14.7; p = 0.91). Rewarming rates were 0.19±0.07°C °C/h (OHE11) and 0.20±0.05°C °C/h (OHE14.7; p = 0.75). Conclusions OHE with diameters of 11 mm and 14.7 mm achieve effective cooling rates for TTM and did not cause any relevant oesophageal tissue damage. Both OHE demonstrated acceptable deviations from target temperature and allowed for an intended rewarming rate (0.25°C/h).
- Subjects :
- Hot Temperature
Physiology
Swine
medicine.medical_treatment
lcsh:Medicine
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Targeted temperature management
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy
Body Temperature
0302 clinical medicine
Anesthesiology
Medicine and Health Sciences
Anesthesia
Myocardial infarction
Pulmonary Arteries
lcsh:Science
Immune Response
Spinal cord injury
Hepatic encephalopathy
Flow Rate
Mammals
Multidisciplinary
Pharmaceutics
Physics
Classical Mechanics
Arteries
Cold Temperature
medicine.anatomical_structure
Physiological Parameters
Vertebrates
Physical Sciences
Female
Anatomy
Research Article
Biotechnology
medicine.medical_specialty
Catheters
Immunology
Fluid Mechanics
Continuum Mechanics
03 medical and health sciences
Esophagus
Signs and Symptoms
Drug Therapy
Diagnostic Medicine
medicine.artery
medicine
Animals
Inflammation
Aorta
business.industry
lcsh:R
Organisms
Biology and Life Sciences
Fluid Dynamics
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
medicine.disease
Surgery
Gastrointestinal Tract
Amniotes
Cardiovascular Anatomy
Blood Vessels
Medical Devices and Equipment
lcsh:Q
Histopathology
business
Digestive System
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 12
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLOS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f7efad6b0632e51119931e47e4ffe949
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173229