Back to Search
Start Over
HPV16 persistent infection and recurrent disease after LEEP
- Source :
- Virology Journal, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-4 (2019), Virology Journal
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background About 23% of patients develop CIN2+ after LEEP treatment due to residual or recurrent lesions. The majority of patients with HPV infection were HPV negative before treatment, but 16,4% were still HPV 16 positive after treatment, indicating that conization do not necessarily clear HPV infection rapidly. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the possible correlation existing between the appearance of recurring high-grade lesions and the viral genotype 16, and other risk factors such as residual disease. Methods One hundred eighty-two HPV positive patients underwent LEEP for CIN2+. The follow-up post treatment was carried out every 6 months. Abnormal results during follow-up were confirmed histologically and considered recurrent high-grade intraepithelial cervical lesions (CIN2/CIN3 or CIS). Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS software package for Windows (version 15.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are expressed as frequency, arithmetic mean, standard deviation (S.D.) and percentages. We calculated significance (P Results In our study, the rate of persistent infection from HPV 16, after LEEP, was 15.9% (29/182) with 94% (17/18) of the recurring disease occurring within 18 months of follow up. From this study it was found that the persistence of genotype 16 is associated with a greater rate of relapse post-conization of CIN 2+ lesions, with respect to other genotypes. Our study further supports those studies that demonstrate that the risk for residual disease or relapse is not to be overlooked, also when the margins are negative, but persistent HPV infection is present. In our case study, 40% of relapses were in women with negative margin, but with persistent HPV 16 infection. Even more so, the margins involved in HPV16 positive subjects is another prediction factor for relapse. Conclusions Our results show the importance of genotyping and that persistent HPV 16 infection should be considered a risk factor for the development of residual/recurrent CIN 2/3.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
medicine.medical_specialty
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
Electrosurgery
Disease
Biology
Papillomavirus infection
Persistence (computer science)
lcsh:Infectious and parasitic diseases
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Virology
Internal medicine
Genotype
medicine
Humans
LEEP
lcsh:RC109-216
Risk factor
Relapse
Genotyping
Retrospective Studies
Human papillomavirus 16
Research
Papillomavirus Infections
HPV infection
Retrospective cohort study
Odds ratio
medicine.disease
female genital diseases and pregnancy complications
030104 developmental biology
Infectious Diseases
Italy
Recurrent desease
CIN2+
Positive margin
Female
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Virology Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f7c3da21c65109c74e39951ea87188cd
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1252-3