Back to Search
Start Over
Post-operative discomfort after ring or clip tubal ligation — is there any difference and do indomethacin suppositories help?
- Source :
- Contraception. 42:309-313
- Publication Year :
- 1990
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 1990.
-
Abstract
- One-hundred patients undergoing Falope ring or clip laparoscopic tubal ligation were given either a placebo or a 100 mg indomethacin rectal suppository one hour preoperatively. Treatment was randomised and double-blind. Post-operative analgesic requirements and side effects were monitored. Forty-seven patients receiving indomethacin and 48 patients receiving placebo were available for analysis. Thirty-five patients in the indomethacin group required Meperidine (pethidine) analgesia (mean dose 58 mg) compared to 41 patients (mean dose 65 mg) in the placebo group. These differences were not significant. There were no significant differences in the non-narcotic analgesia given to each group, the side effects or the number requiring to stay overnight in the hospital. Analysis of the analgesic requirements of the 53 patients having clip sterilization and the 42 patients sterilized with Falope rings showed no statistical differences. This trial suggests that the immediate post-operative discomfort rates between ring and clip tubal occlusion are not different and that there is no significant benefit from the use of an indomethacin suppository pre-operatively.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Sterilization, Tubal
Indomethacin
Analgesic
Suppository
Placebo
Double-Blind Method
medicine
Humans
Laparoscopy
Pain, Postoperative
Tubal ligation
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Suppositories
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Surgery
Pethidine
medicine.anatomical_structure
Reproductive Medicine
Rectal administration
Anesthesia
Female
business
medicine.drug
Fallopian tube
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00107824
- Volume :
- 42
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Contraception
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f781458e06002aa8891a59a37b89fdd5
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(90)90018-q