Back to Search
Start Over
An empiric analysis of 5 counter measures against surgical site infections following spine surgery—a pragmatic approach and review of the literature
- Source :
- The Spine Journal. 19:267-275
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgical site infections (SSI) following spine surgery are debilitating complications to patients and costly to the healthcare system. PURPOSE Review the impact and cost effectiveness of 5 SSI prevention interventions on SSI rates in an orthopedic spine surgery practice at a major quaternary healthcare system over a 10-year period. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE All of the surgical patients of the 5 spine surgeons in our department over a 10-year period were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES SSI rates per year, standardized infection ratios (SIR) for laminectomies and fusions during the most recent 3-year period, year of implementation, and frequency of use of the different interventions, cost of the techniques. METHODS The SSI prevention techniques described in this paper include application of intrawound vancomycin powder, wound irrigation with dilute betadine solution, preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate scrubs, preoperative screening with nasal swabbing, and decolonization of S. aureus, and perioperative antibiotic administration. Our institution's infection prevention and control data were analyzed for the yearly SSI rates for the orthopedic spine surgery department from 2006 to 2016. In addition, our orthopedic spine surgeons were polled to determine with what frequency and duration they have been using the different SSI prevention interventions. RESULTS SSI rates decreased from almost 6% per year the first year of observation to less than 2% per year in the final 6 years of this study. A SIR of less than 1.0 for each year was observed for laminectomies and fusions for the period from 2013 to 2016. All surgeons polled at our institution uniformly used perioperative antibiotics, Hibiclens scrub, and the nasal swab protocol since the implementation of these techniques. Some variability existed in the frequency and duration of betadine irrigation and application of vancomycin powder. A cost analysis demonstrated these methods to be nominal compared with the cost of treating a single SSI. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to reduce SSI rates in spine surgery with easy, safe, and cost-effective protocols, when implemented in a standardized manner.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Psychological intervention
Context (language use)
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Vancomycin
medicine
Humans
Surgical Wound Infection
Infection control
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Therapeutic Irrigation
030222 orthopedics
business.industry
General surgery
Laminectomy
Retrospective cohort study
Perioperative
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Staphylococcal Infections
Spine
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Orthopedic surgery
Surgery
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15299430
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Spine Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f6646fe6eb73d35c31fe3b52f4d0d7e9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.043