Back to Search Start Over

Results of a two-phased clinical study evaluating a new multiband mucosectomy device for early Barrett’s neoplasia: a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial and a pilot therapeutic pilot study

Authors :
Jjghm Bergman
Bas L. Weusten
Roos E. Pouw
D. W. Schölvinck
Suzanne S. Gisbertz
M. I. van Berge Henegouwen
Sybren L. Meijer
Kamar Belghazi
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Graduate School
AGEM - Re-generation and cancer of the digestive system
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
Surgery
Pathology
Gastroenterology and hepatology
VU University medical center
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy, Belghazi, K, Schölvinck, D W, van Berge Henegouwen, M I, Gisbertz, S S, Weusten, B L, Meijer, S L, Bergman, J J & Pouw, R E 2019, ' Results of a two-phased clinical study evaluating a new multiband mucosectomy device for early Barrett's neoplasia : a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial and a pilot therapeutic pilot study ', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2864-2872 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6582-5, Surgical endoscopy, 33(9), 2864-2872. Springer New York, Surgical Endoscopy, 33(9), 2864-2872. Springer New York, Surgical endoscopy, 33(9), 2864. Springer New York
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is the preferred technique for piecemeal resection of early neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE). The currently most widely used device for MBM is the Duette device. Recently, the Captivator EMR device has come available which might have practical advantages over the Duette device.METHODS: Phase I was a randomized pre-esophagectomy trial with a non-inferiority design aiming to compare EMR specimens obtained with the Captivator and the Duette device.PRIMARY OUTCOME: max diameter of the EMR specimens, secondary outcomes: min diameter, max thickness of the EMR specimens and resected submucosal stroma. Phase II were clinical pilot cases aiming to evaluate the feasibility of EMR using the Captivator device. Primary outcome was the successful EMR rate and secondary outcomes included procedure time and adverse events.RESULTS: Phase I: 24 EMR specimens (12 pairs) were obtained from six patients. The median max diameter of EMR specimens obtained with the Captivator device was 16 mm [IQR 12-21] versus 18 mm [IQR 13-23] for the Duette device. Non-inferiority of the max diameter of the Captivator specimens could not be demonstrated (median difference 1 mm, 95% CI - 3.26 to + 5.26). However, when using paired analysis, no significant difference was found (p 0.573). In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in the min diameter, max thickness of EMR specimens, and max thickness of resected submucosal stroma. Phase II: 5 BE patients with early neoplastic lesions were included. Successful EMR was achieved in 100%. Median procedure time was 33 min (IQR 25-39). One patient developed transient dysphagia, without signs of stenosis on endoscopy.CONCLUSIONS: EMR of early Barrett's neoplasia using the Captivator device is comparable to Duette EMR when looking at size of resected specimens. In the first patients, EMR using the Captivator was feasible, resulting in successful resection without acute adverse events.

Details

ISSN :
14322218 and 09302794
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f5390b821fba57319b98e0cda2d27147
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6582-5