Back to Search
Start Over
Conserving the birds of Uganda's Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
- Source :
- Hulme, M F, Vickery, J A, Green, R E, Phalan, B, Chamberlain, D E, Pomeroy, D E, Nalwanga, D, Mushabe, D, Katebaka, R, Bolwig, S & Atkinson, P W 2013, ' Conserving the birds of Uganda's Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared ', P L o S One, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. e54597 ., PLoS ONE, Technical University of Denmark Orbit, PLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 2, p e54597 (2013)
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Reconciling the aims of feeding an ever more demanding human population and conserving biodiversity is a difficult challenge. Here, we explore potential solutions by assessing whether land sparing (farming for high yield, potentially enabling the protection of non-farmland habitat), land sharing (lower yielding farming with more biodiversity within farmland) or a mixed strategy would result in better bird conservation outcomes for a specified level of agricultural production. We surveyed forest and farmland study areas in southern Uganda, measuring the population density of 256 bird species and agricultural yield: food energy and gross income. Parametric non-linear functions relating density to yield were fitted. Species were identified as "winners" (total population size always at least as great with agriculture present as without it) or "losers" (total population sometimes or always reduced with agriculture present) for a range of targets for total agricultural production. For each target we determined whether each species would be predicted to have a higher total population with land sparing, land sharing or with any intermediate level of sparing at an intermediate yield. We found that most species were expected to have their highest total populations with land sparing, particularly loser species and species with small global range sizes. Hence, more species would benefit from high-yield farming if used as part of a strategy to reduce forest loss than from low-yield farming and land sharing, as has been found in Ghana and India in a previous study. We caution against advocacy for high-yield farming alone as a means to deliver land sparing if it is done without strong protection for natural habitats, other ecosystem services and social welfare. Instead, we suggest that conservationists explore how conservation and agricultural policies can be better integrated to deliver land sparing by, for example, combining land-use planning and agronomic support for small farmers.
- Subjects :
- Environmental Impacts
Biodiversity
lcsh:Medicine
Coffea
Ecosystem services
Trees
Ornithology
Uganda
lcsh:Science
Conservation Science
SDG 15 - Life on Land
education.field_of_study
Likelihood Functions
Multidisciplinary
Ecology
Agroforestry
Environmental resource management
Agriculture
Terrestrial Environments
Habitat
Research Article
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecological Metrics
Population
Biology
Ecosystems
Birds
Agricultural Production
Animals
Humans
Agricultural productivity
education
Bird conservation
SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
Ecosystem
Species Extinction
Population Density
business.industry
lcsh:R
Musa
Food energy
lcsh:Q
Species Richness
business
Zoology
Ecological Environments
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Hulme, M F, Vickery, J A, Green, R E, Phalan, B, Chamberlain, D E, Pomeroy, D E, Nalwanga, D, Mushabe, D, Katebaka, R, Bolwig, S & Atkinson, P W 2013, ' Conserving the birds of Uganda's Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared ', P L o S One, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. e54597 ., PLoS ONE, Technical University of Denmark Orbit, PLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 2, p e54597 (2013)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f4e59d710837eacc1713c2a42bff0380