Back to Search Start Over

The Contribution of Halos with Different Mass Ratios to the Overall Growth of Cluster-sized Halos

Authors :
Daniel D. Kelson
Wei Zheng
Stephanie Jouvel
Doron Lemze
Andrew B. Newman
Adi Zitrin
Holland C. Ford
Peter Melchior
Italo Balestra
Tom Broadhurst
Genevieve J. Graves
Piero Rosati
Alberto Molino
Matthias Bartelmann
Sara Ogaz
Leopoldo Infante
Dan Maoz
Massimo Meneghetti
Anton M. Koekemoer
Keiichi Umetsu
Narciso Benítez
David J. Sand
Andrea Biviano
Julian Merten
Elinor Medezinski
Shy Genel
Rychard Bouwens
Stella Seitz
Claudio Grillo
M. Scodeggio
Amata Mercurio
Marc Postman
Mario Nonino
Ofer Lahav
John Moustakas
Leonidas A. Moustakas
Megan Donahue
Dan Coe
G. Mark Voit
Larry Bradley
Yolanda Jiménez-Teja
Waqas Bhatti
Source :
The Astrophysical Journal, Artículos CONICYT, CONICYT Chile, instacron:CONICYT, The Astrophysical Journal, 776, 91
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

We provide a new observational test for a key prediction of the \Lambda CDM cosmological model: the contributions of mergers with different halo-to-main-cluster mass ratios to cluster-sized halo growth. We perform this test by dynamically analyzing seven galaxy clusters, spanning the redshift range $0.13 < z_c < 0.45$ and caustic mass range $0.4-1.5$ $10^{15} h_{0.73}^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$, with an average of 293 spectroscopically-confirmed bound galaxies to each cluster. The large radial coverage (a few virial radii), which covers the whole infall region, with a high number of spectroscopically identified galaxies enables this new study. For each cluster, we identify bound galaxies. Out of these galaxies, we identify infalling and accreted halos and estimate their masses and their dynamical states. Using the estimated masses, we derive the contribution of different mass ratios to cluster-sized halo growth. For mass ratios between ~0.2 and ~0.7, we find a ~1 $\sigma$ agreement with \Lambda CDM expectations based on the Millennium simulations I and II. At low mass ratios, $\lesssim 0.2$, our derived contribution is underestimated since the detection efficiency decreases at low masses, $\sim 2 \times 10^{14}$ $h_{0.73}^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$. At large mass ratios, $\gtrsim 0.7$, we do not detect halos probably because our sample, which was chosen to be quite X-ray relaxed, is biased against large mass ratios. Therefore, at large mass ratios, the derived contribution is also underestimated.<br />Comment: 25 pages, 16 figures, 6 tables, 2 machine readable tables, accepted for publication in ApJ, updated acknowledgements and data table format modifications made

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Astrophysical Journal, Artículos CONICYT, CONICYT Chile, instacron:CONICYT, The Astrophysical Journal, 776, 91
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f44b96ab7acf796867eab14adb12de98