Back to Search Start Over

Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study

Authors :
Coen W. Hurkmans
Uulke A. van der Heide
Suresh Senan
Johan P. Cuijpers
D. Schuring
Joachim Widder
Frank J. Lagerwaard
Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
Radiation Oncology
CCA - Innovative therapy
Source :
Radiation Oncology (London, England), Hurkmans, C M, Cuijpers, J P, Lagerwaard, F J, Widder, J, van der Heide, U A, Schuring, D & Senan, S 2009, ' Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study ', Radiation Oncology, vol. 4 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-1, Radiation oncology, 4:1. BMC, Radiation Oncology, 4. BioMed Central, Radiation Oncology, Vol 4, Iss 1, p 1 (2009)
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Background A phase III multi-centre randomised trial (ROSEL) has been initiated to establish the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with operable stage IA lung cancer. Due to rapid changes in radiotherapy technology and evolving techniques for image-guided delivery, guidelines had to be developed in order to ensure uniformity in implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy in this multi-centre study. Methods/Design A Quality Assurance Working Party was formed by radiation oncologists and clinical physicists from both academic as well as non-academic hospitals that had already implemented stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. A literature survey was conducted and consensus meetings were held in which both the knowledge from the literature and clinical experience were pooled. In addition, a planning study was performed in 26 stage I patients, of which 22 were stage 1A, in order to develop and evaluate the planning guidelines. Plans were optimised according to parameters adopted from RTOG trials using both an algorithm with a simple homogeneity correction (Type A) and a more advanced algorithm (Type B). Dose conformity requirements were then formulated based on these results. Conclusion Based on current literature and expert experience, guidelines were formulated for this phase III study of stereotactic radiotherapy versus surgery. These guidelines can serve to facilitate the design of future multi-centre clinical trials of stereotactic radiotherapy in other patient groups and aid a more uniform implementation of this technique outside clinical trials.

Details

ISSN :
1748717X
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiation Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f3e11e5c21981c63ff9a312e0092c3c2