Back to Search
Start Over
Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study
- Source :
- Radiation Oncology (London, England), Hurkmans, C M, Cuijpers, J P, Lagerwaard, F J, Widder, J, van der Heide, U A, Schuring, D & Senan, S 2009, ' Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study ', Radiation Oncology, vol. 4 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-1, Radiation oncology, 4:1. BMC, Radiation Oncology, 4. BioMed Central, Radiation Oncology, Vol 4, Iss 1, p 1 (2009)
- Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Background A phase III multi-centre randomised trial (ROSEL) has been initiated to establish the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with operable stage IA lung cancer. Due to rapid changes in radiotherapy technology and evolving techniques for image-guided delivery, guidelines had to be developed in order to ensure uniformity in implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy in this multi-centre study. Methods/Design A Quality Assurance Working Party was formed by radiation oncologists and clinical physicists from both academic as well as non-academic hospitals that had already implemented stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. A literature survey was conducted and consensus meetings were held in which both the knowledge from the literature and clinical experience were pooled. In addition, a planning study was performed in 26 stage I patients, of which 22 were stage 1A, in order to develop and evaluate the planning guidelines. Plans were optimised according to parameters adopted from RTOG trials using both an algorithm with a simple homogeneity correction (Type A) and a more advanced algorithm (Type B). Dose conformity requirements were then formulated based on these results. Conclusion Based on current literature and expert experience, guidelines were formulated for this phase III study of stereotactic radiotherapy versus surgery. These guidelines can serve to facilitate the design of future multi-centre clinical trials of stereotactic radiotherapy in other patient groups and aid a more uniform implementation of this technique outside clinical trials.
- Subjects :
- lcsh:Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES
medicine.medical_specialty
RESECTION
Lung Neoplasms
BODY RADIATION-THERAPY
MOTION
Quality Assurance, Health Care
lcsh:R895-920
medicine.medical_treatment
IMAGE GUIDANCE
Radiation Dosage
lcsh:RC254-282
law.invention
Stereotaxic Techniques
Study Protocol
Randomized controlled trial
law
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Humans
Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Medical physics
TARGET VOLUME GENERATION
Stage (cooking)
Radiometry
Lung cancer
business.industry
CT SCANS
lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
medicine.disease
TUMORS
Radiation therapy
Clinical trial
RESPIRATION
Oncology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Stereotaxic technique
Radiation Oncology
4-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
business
Literature survey
Monte Carlo Method
Quality assurance
Algorithms
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1748717X
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Radiation Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f3e11e5c21981c63ff9a312e0092c3c2