Back to Search Start Over

Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing

Authors :
Jennifer M Folster
Natalie J. Thornburg
Magdalena Medrzycki
Devlin Cole
John Paul Bigouette
Geroncio C Fajardo
Bettina Bankamp
Ryan P. Westergaard
Kimberly Goffard
Collin Pitts
Hannah Browne
Jing Zhang
Miranda J Delahoy
Laura Ford
Jennifer L Harcourt
Michael D. Bowen
Christine Lee
Marie K. Kirby
Brandi Limbago
Ailam Lim
Brett Whitaker
Dena Bushman
Gaston Bonenfant
Kimberly Langolf
Blake Cherney
Tara Zochert
Hannah L Kirking
Bin Zhou
Dustin W Currie
Jacqueline E. Tate
Marie E Killerby
Glen R. Abedi
Motria Caudill
Nicole A. Aulik
Patrick Kelly
Douglas Gieryn
Allen C. Bateman
Azaibi Tamin
Ian W Pray
Krista Queen
Juliana Kahrs
Patricia L. Shewmaker
Source :
Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

Background Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and antigen tests are important diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sensitivity of antigen tests has been shown to be lower than that of rRT-PCR; however, data to evaluate epidemiologic characteristics that affect test performance are limited. Methods Paired mid-turbinate nasal swabs were collected from university students and staff and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using both Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) and rRT-PCR assay. Specimens positive by either rRT-PCR or antigen FIA were placed in viral culture and tested for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with antigen results, rRT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, sgRNA, and viral culture. Results Antigen FIA sensitivity was 78.9% and 43.8% among symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, respectively. Among rRT-PCR positive participants, negative antigen results were more likely among asymptomatic participants (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–15.4) and less likely among participants reporting nasal congestion (OR 0.1, 95% CI: .03–.8). rRT-PCR-positive specimens with higher Ct values (OR 0.5, 95% CI: .4–.8) were less likely, and specimens positive for sgRNA (OR 10.2, 95% CI: 1.6–65.0) more likely, to yield positive virus isolation. Antigen testing was >90% positive in specimens with Ct values Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 antigen test advantages include low cost, wide availability and rapid turnaround time, making them important screening tests. The performance of antigen tests may vary with patient characteristics, so performance characteristics should be accounted for when designing testing strategies and interpreting results.

Details

ISSN :
15376591 and 10584838
Volume :
73
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f356852c0aa1e43df1f0b3c39f71405a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab303