Back to Search Start Over

Risk factors for poor renal prognosis in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome

Authors :
Angela Caringella
Elio Salvaggio
Laura De Petris
Leopoldo Peratoner
Maurizio Gaido
Lucilla Ravà
Alberto Edefonti
Alfredo Caprioli
Rosanna Coppo
Alfonso Ferretti
Giovanni Montini
Giovambattista Capasso
Gianfranco Rizzoni
Rosa Penza
Salvatore Li Volti
Alessandra Gianviti
Carmen Setzu
Gianluigi Ardissino
Nunzia Miglietti
Salvatore Maffei
Carmine Pecoraro
Alberto Eugenio Tozzi
Graziella Zacchello
Ilse Ratsche
Alberto Bettinelli
Silvio Maringhini
Marco Pennesi
Francesco Perfumo
Ivana Pela
Giuliana Lama
Tommaso De Palo
Gianviti, A
Tozzi, Ae
DE PETRIS, L
Caprioli, A
Rava, L
Edefonti, A
Ardissino, G
Montini, G
Zacchello, G
Ferretti, A
Pecoraro, C
DE PALO, T
Caringella, A
Gaido, M
Coppo, R
Perfumo, F
Miglietti, N
Ratsche, I
Penza, R
Capasso, Giovambattista
Maringhini, S
LI VOLTI, S
Setzu, C
Pennesi, M
Bettinelli, A
Peratoner, L
Pela, I
Salvaggio, E
Lama, G
Maffei, S
Rizzoni, G.
Source :
Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 18(12)
Publication Year :
2003

Abstract

Many factors have been proposed as predictors of poor renal prognosis in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), but their role is still controversial. Our aim was to detect the most reliable early predictors of poor renal prognosis to promptly identify children at major risk of bad outcome who could eventually benefit from early specific treatments, such as plasmapheresis. Prognostic factors identifiable at onset of HUS were evaluated by survival analysis and a proportional hazard model. These included age at onset, prodromal diarrhea (D), leukocyte count, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, and evidence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection. Three hundred and eighty-seven HUS cases were reported; 276 were investigated for STEC infection and 189 (68%) proved positive. Age at onset, leukocyte count, and CNS involvement were not associated with the time to recovery. Absence of prodromal D and lack of evidence of STEC infection were independently associated with a poor renal prognosis; only 34% of patients D(-)STEC(- )recovered normal renal function compared with 65%-76% of D(+)STEC(+), D(+)STEC(-) and D(-)STEC(+ )patients. In conclusion, absence of both D and evidence of STEC infection are needed to identify patients with HUS and worst prognosis, while D(-) but STEC(+) patients have a significantly better prognosis.

Details

ISSN :
0931041X
Volume :
18
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f342f5df275154598f3770ce8f194509