Back to Search Start Over

The role of surfactant in the miniemulsion polymerization of biodegradable polyurethane nanoparticles

Authors :
Elenara Lemos-Senna
Redouane Borsali
Henri Cramail
Betina G. Zanetti-Ramos
Valdir Soldi
Eric Cloutet
Grupo de Estudos em Materiais Poliméricos (POLIMAT)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina = Federal University of Santa Catarina [Florianópolis] (UFSC)
Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Ciencias Farmaceut
Univ Fed Santa Catarina
Laboratoire de Chimie des polymères organiques (LCPO)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)
Team 2 LCPO : Biopolymers & Bio-sourced Polymers
Laboratoire de Chimie des Polymères Organiques (LCPO)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux-Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, de Biologie et de Physique (ENSCBP)-Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux-Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, de Biologie et de Physique (ENSCBP)-Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)
Team 4 LCPO : Polymer Materials for Electronic, Energy, Information and Communication Technologies
Source :
Materials Science and Engineering: C, Materials Science and Engineering: C, Elsevier, 2008, 8 (4 Sp. Iss. SI), pp.526-531. ⟨10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.041⟩
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2008.

Abstract

International audience; The influence of surfactant type and concentration on particle size, formulation yield and stability of the polyurethane (PUR) nanoparticles synthesized by miniemulsion polymerization was investigated. SDS, Tween 80 and Pluronic F68 were employed as surfactants in concentration ranging from 5 to 20% (vs monomer concentration). The surfactant SDS was found not efficient in our system, resulting in a low formulation yield (about 53%), two particle size distributions and zeta potential equal to - 52.3mV. On the other hand, the nonionic surfactants gave monomodal particle size distribution, good yields (> 85%) and zeta potential around to- 24mV. The particles synthesized with Tween 80 or Pluronic F68 were very similar to each other in terms of efficiency, particle size distribution and zeta potential. For instance, the particle diameter slightly decreases from 292nm to 261nm as the amount of Tween 80 surfactant increases from 5 to 20wt.% vs monomer. Moreover, we have observed that a concentration of at least 5wt. % of Tween 80 was necessary to favor particle stability and therefore to avoid aggregation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09284931
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Materials Science and Engineering: C, Materials Science and Engineering: C, Elsevier, 2008, 8 (4 Sp. Iss. SI), pp.526-531. ⟨10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.041⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f27bf59de878c13c7d78842ce76fa9ce
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.041⟩