Back to Search Start Over

Complex deformation at shallow depth during the 30 October 2016 Mw6.5 Norcia earthquake: interference between tectonic and gravity processes?

Authors :
Eric Jacques
Yann Klinger
Yu Morishita
Marc Pierrot-Deseilligny
Arthur Delorme
Nathalie Feuillet
Ewelina Rupnik
Raphaël Grandin
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-IPG PARIS-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)
Laboratoire sciences et technologies de l'information géographique (LaSTIG)
Ecole des Ingénieurs de la Ville de Paris (EIVP)-École nationale des sciences géographiques (ENSG)
Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière [IGN] (IGN)-Université Gustave Eiffel-Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière [IGN] (IGN)-Université Gustave Eiffel
University of Leeds
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Laboratoire des Sciences et Technologies de l'Information Géographique (LaSTIG)
École nationale des sciences géographiques (ENSG)
Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière [IGN] (IGN)-Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière [IGN] (IGN)
Source :
Tectonics, Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020, ⟨10.1029/2019TC005596⟩, Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020, 39 (2), ⟨10.1029/2019tc005596⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; The relation between slip at the near surface and at depth during earthquakes is still not fully resolved at the moment. This deficiency leads to large uncertainties in the evaluation of the magnitude of past earthquakes based on surface observations, which is the only accessible evidence for such events. A better knowledge of the way slip distributes over distinct rupture strands within the first few kilometers from the surface would contribute greatly to reduce these uncertainties. The 30 October 2016 Mw6.5 Norcia earthquake has been captured by a variety of geodetic techniques, which provide access to the slip distribution both at depth and at the ground surface, with an unprecedented level of detail for a normal‐faulting earthquake. We first present coseismic surface offset measurements from correlation of optical satellite images of submetric resolution, which are compared to field observations made shortly after the earthquake. Based on a joint inversion of optical data together with InSAR and GPS data, we then propose a rupture model that explains the observations both at far‐field and near‐field scales. Finally, we explore different rupture geometries at shallow depth, in an attempt to better explain the near‐field deformation (i.e., within the first hundreds of meters around the fault) observed at the surface. Despite the fact that the solution is not unique, several lines of evidence suggest that gravity processes could be locally involved, which interfere with the dominant tectonic processes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02787407 and 19449194
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Tectonics, Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020, ⟨10.1029/2019TC005596⟩, Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020, 39 (2), ⟨10.1029/2019tc005596⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f15601f923f6cd27b290cccc5a0577c6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005596⟩