Back to Search Start Over

The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall

Authors :
Sophie Portrat
Valérie Camos
Laboratoire d'Etude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement [Dijon] (LEAD)
Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (LPNC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 (UPMF)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])
Laboratoire d'Etude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement [Dijon] ( LEAD )
Université de Bourgogne ( UB ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS )
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition ( LPNC )
Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 ( UPMF ) -Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 ( UJF ) -Université Savoie Mont Blanc ( USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Grenoble Alpes ( UGA )
Source :
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Psychonomic Society, 2015, 22 (4), pp.1029-1034. ⟨10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5⟩, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Psychonomic Society, 2015, 22 (4), pp.1029-1034. 〈10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5〉
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2014.

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that long-term retention of items studied in a working memory span task depends on the refreshing of memory items—more specifically, on the number of refreshing opportunities. However, it was previously shown that refreshing depends on the cognitive load of the concurrent task introduced in the working memory span task. Thus, cognitive load should determine the long-term retention of items assessed in a delayed-recall test if such retention relies on refreshing. In two experiments, while the amount of refreshing opportunities remained constant, we varied the cognitive load of the concurrent task by either introducing tasks differing in their attentional demands or varying the pace of the concurrent task. To verify that this effect was related to refreshing and not to any maintenance mechanism, we also manipulated the availability of subvocal rehearsal. Replicating previous results, increasing cognitive load reduced immediate recall. This increase also had a detrimental effect on delayed recall. Conversely, the addition of concurrent articulation reduced immediate but not delayed recall. This study shows that both working and episodic memory traces depend on the cognitive load of the concurrent task, whereas the use of rehearsal affects only working memory performance. These findings add further evidence of the dissociation between subvocal rehearsal and attentional refreshing.

Details

ISSN :
15315320 and 10699384
Volume :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f1547a31cd2630da7407e5aa9414747d