Cite
Morphology is not a reliable taxonomic tool for the genus Lernaea: molecular data and experimental infection reveal that L. cyprinacea and L. cruciata are conspecific
MLA
Ivan Jakovlić, et al. “Morphology Is Not a Reliable Taxonomic Tool for the Genus Lernaea: Molecular Data and Experimental Infection Reveal That L. Cyprinacea and L. Cruciata Are Conspecific.” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 12, Dec. 2019. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....f144309190c271082df3448f1e1975e1&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Ivan Jakovlić, Gui T. Wang, Dong Zhang, Wen X. Li, Shan G. Wu, Cong J. Hua, Ming Li, & Hong Zou. (2019). Morphology is not a reliable taxonomic tool for the genus Lernaea: molecular data and experimental infection reveal that L. cyprinacea and L. cruciata are conspecific. Parasites & Vectors, 12.
Chicago
Ivan Jakovlić, Gui T. Wang, Dong Zhang, Wen X. Li, Shan G. Wu, Cong J. Hua, Ming Li, and Hong Zou. 2019. “Morphology Is Not a Reliable Taxonomic Tool for the Genus Lernaea: Molecular Data and Experimental Infection Reveal That L. Cyprinacea and L. Cruciata Are Conspecific.” Parasites & Vectors 12 (December). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....f144309190c271082df3448f1e1975e1&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.