Back to Search Start Over

Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in women receiving therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin

Authors :
Joris A. M. van der Post
Danny M. Cohn
Saskia Middeldorp
Harry R. Büller
Pieter Willem Kamphuisen
Sara Roshani
Hans Wolf
Alexander Stehouwer
Other departments
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences
Vascular Medicine
Cardiovascular Centre (CVC)
Vascular Ageing Programme (VAP)
Source :
BMJ open, 1(2). BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ Open, BMJ Open, 1(2). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the drug of choice to prevent venous thrombosis in pregnancy, but the optimal dose for prevention while avoiding bleeding is unclear. This study investigated whether therapeutic doses of LMWH increase the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in a retrospective controlled cohort. Methods All pregnant women who received therapeutic doses of LMWH between 1995 and 2008 were identified in the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The controls were women registered for antenatal care in the same hospital who did not use LMWH during pregnancy, matched by random electronic selection for age, parity and delivery date to LMWH users. The incidence of PPH (blood loss >500 ml), severe PPH (blood loss >1000 ml) and median blood loss were compared in two cohorts of LMWH users and non-users. Results The incidence of PPH was 18% in LMWH users (N=95) and 22% in non-users (N=524) (RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4). The incidence of severe PPH was 6% in both groups (RR 1.2; 0.5 to 2.9). The median amount of blood loss differed only in normal vaginal deliveries. It was 200 ml in LMWH users and 300 ml in non-users (difference −100 ml; 95% CI −156 to −44). Conclusion Therapeutic doses of LMWH in pregnancy were observed not to be associated with a clinically meaningful increase in the incidence of PPH or severe PPH in women delivered in this hospital, although this observation may be confounded by the differential use of strategies to prevent bleeding. A randomised controlled trial is necessary to provide a definite answer about the optimal dose of LMWH in pregnancy.<br />Article summary Article focus To compare the incidence of PPH (ie, blood loss >500 ml in the first 24 h of delivery) in two cohorts of pregnant women who were treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH and those who were not. To compare the incidence of severe PPH (blood loss >1000 ml) in two cohorts of pregnant women who were treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH and those who were not. To compare the median blood loss in two cohorts of pregnant women who were treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH and those who were not. Key message Therapeutic doses of LMWH in pregnancy were not associated with a clinically meaningful increase in the incidence of PPH (RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4) or severe PPH (RR 1.2; 0.5 to 2.9) in women delivered in our hospital. The median amount of blood loss differed only in normal vaginal deliveries. It was lower in LMWH users (200 ml) than in non-users (300 ml) (difference −100 ml; 95% CI −156 to −44). Strength and limitation of this study This is the largest cohort of pregnancies treated with high doses of LMWH. Although this was a controlled cohort study, it is likely that strategies to decrease the risk of PPH differed between women who were treated with LMWH and controls.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
1
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f10e4d9587df4acaed109cc9174222e2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000257