Back to Search Start Over

Comparative evaluation of standard maintenance-dose clopidogrel versus low-dose prasugrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

Authors :
Kaoru, Akimaru
Masashi, Iwabuchi
Akio, Ishida
Hiroki, Uehara
Namio, Higa
Masanori, Kakazu
Minoru, Wake
Taketoshi, Maeda
Toshiki, Maeda
Hisatomi, Arima
Yusuke, Ohya
Shinta, Tokashiki
Hayashi, Wakugawa
Ayane, Miyagi
Shinya, Shiohira
Satoshi, Zaima
Tomohiro, Shiohira
Yuichirou, Toma
Hidekazu, Ikemiyagi
Source :
International Journal of Cardiology. 356:30-35
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Treatment with low-dose prasugrel might be more beneficial even in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with clopidogrel. We compared platelet reactivity between standard maintenance-dose and low-dose prasugrel in stable CAD patients.This multicenter study enrolled 164 stable CAD patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients were randomly assigned to continue treatment with 75-mg clopidogrel daily (n = 80) or switch to 3.75-mg prasugrel daily (n = 84). Platelet reactivity was evaluated by measuring P2YThe PRU level was comparable between the two groups at baseline but was significantly lower in the prasugrel group than in the clopidogrel group on days 5 (133.0 vs. 156.8 PRU, P = 0.005) and 30 (124.3 vs. 158.0 PRU, P 0.001). On day 30, the PRU level was lower in the prasugrel group among patients categorized as poor and intermediate metabolizers but not among extensive metabolizers.Low-dose prasugrel achieves more consistent antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel irrespective of the metabolic phenotype in Japanese patients with stable CAD. Low-dose prasugrel might be also beneficial in the chronic phase without increasing the bleeding risk among stable CAD patients in other countries.

Details

ISSN :
01675273
Volume :
356
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f0e9bb7d62208d16c1151c2a539baab0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.02.023