Back to Search Start Over

A review of the in situ probe designs from recent ice giant mission concept studies

Authors :
Diego Turrini
David J. Atkinson
Olivier Witasse
Athena Coustenis
Amy Simon
Chris S. Arridge
Francesca Ferri
Kim Reh
Adam Masters
Mark Hofstadter
Leigh N. Fletcher
Olivier Mousis
The Royal Society
Laboratoire d'études spatiales et d'instrumentation en astrophysique (LESIA (UMR_8109))
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)
Source :
Space Science Reviews, Space Science Reviews, Springer Verlag, 2020, 216 (1), ⟨10.1007/s11214-020-0639-1⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; For the Ice Giants, atmospheric entry probes provide critical measurements not attainable via remote observations. Including the 2013-2022 NASA Planetary Decadal Survey , there have been at least five comprehensive atmospheric probe engineering design studies performed in recent years by NASA and ESA. International science definition teams have assessed the science requirements, and each recommended similar measurements and payloads to meet science goals with current instrument technology. The probe system concept has matured and converged on general design parameters that indicate the probe would include a 1-meter class aeroshell and have a mass around 350 to 400-kg. Probe battery sizes vary, depending on the duration of a post-release coast phase, and assumptions about heaters and instrument power needs. The various mission concepts demonstrate the need for advanced power and thermal protection system development. 17 Page 2 of 13 A.A. Simon et al. show an Ice Giant mission with an in situ probe is feasible and would be welcomed by the international science community.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00386308 and 15729672
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Space Science Reviews, Space Science Reviews, Springer Verlag, 2020, 216 (1), ⟨10.1007/s11214-020-0639-1⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f016e71088288a98ff93077764f8ebf9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-0639-1⟩