Back to Search Start Over

International Expert Consensus Statement

Authors :
Felix Mahfoud
Franz H. Messerli
Darrel P. Francis
Bryan Williams
Murray D. Esler
Krishna J. Rocha-Singh
Roland E. Schmieder
Henry Krum
Thomas Zeller
Dagmara Hering
Giuseppe Mancia
Costas Tsioufis
Paul A. Sobotka
Vito M. Campese
Krzysztof Narkiewicz
Richard E. Katholi
George L. Bakris
Lars Christian Rump
Sverre E. Kjeldsen
Guido Grassi
Michael A. Weber
Markus P. Schlaich
Domenic A. Sica
Michael Böhm
Peter J. Blankestijn
Luis M. Ruilope
Oliver Vonend
Gianfranco Parati
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 62(22):2031-2045
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

Catheter-based radiofrequency ablation technology to disrupt both efferent and afferent renal nerves has recently been introduced to clinical medicine after the demonstration of significant systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions. Clinical trial data available thus far have been obtained primarily in patients with resistant hypertension, defined as standardized systolic clinic blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg (or ≥ 150 mm Hg in patients with type 2 diabetes) despite appropriate pharmacologic treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic agent. Accordingly, these criteria and blood pressure thresholds should be borne in mind when selecting patients for renal nerve ablation. Secondary forms of hypertension and pseudoresistance, such as nonadherence to medication, intolerance of medication, and white coat hypertension, should have been ruled out, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is mandatory in this context. Because there are theoretical concerns with regard to renal safety, selected patients should have preserved renal function, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Optimal periprocedural management of volume status and medication regimens at specialized and experienced centers equipped with adequate infrastructure to cope with potential procedural complications will minimize potential patient risks. Long-term safety and efficacy data are limited to 3 years of follow-up in small patient cohorts, so efforts to monitor treated patients are crucial to define the long-term performance of the procedure. Although renal nerve ablation could have beneficial effects in other conditions characterized by elevated renal sympathetic nerve activity, its potential use for such indications should currently be limited to formal research studies of its safety and efficacy.

Details

ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
62
Issue :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....efb0f698a64a48525e1e6e9301e0dd88
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1616