Health-related quality of life after isolated limb perfusion compared to extended resection, or amputation for locally advanced extremity sarcoma: Is a limb salvage strategy worth the effort?

e23539 Background: Induction isolated limb perfusion (ILP) followed by limb-sparing resection or extended resection are frequently used limb salvation strategies (LSS) in locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) to prevent amputation. However little is known about the long term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) such as HRQoL after ILP compared to extended resection or amputation. Methods: Patients treated with an ILP, extended resection, or amputation were selected from the respondents of a multi-institutional cross-sectional cohort survivorship study (SURVSARC) conducted 2-10 years after diagnosis among sarcoma survivors registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Extended resection was defined as resection for stage III eSTS, details regarding amputation levels other than upper or lower extremity are unknown. Used PROs were the EORTC QLQ-C30, Cancer worry scale (CWS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Results: We identified 96 eSTS survivors and assigned them into four groups: ILP (N = 20), extended resection (N = 48), primary amputation (N = 20), and amputation after ILP (N = 8). While there were no differences in PROs between ILP and extended resections, results showed better functioning and functionality after these two LSS groups versus the amputation groups. The amputation groups scored significantly lower on the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale (p < 0.001, 62.7 and 65.7 versus 78.0 and 84.1) and role functioning scale (p = 0.038, 67.5 and 52.8 versus 79.2 and 80.9), which both account for a difference with ‘medium’ clinical relevance. Also for the TESS, the scores were significantly lower for the amputation groups compared to the LSS groups (upper extremity p = 0.007 with 68.9 and 71.6 versus 93.3 and 91.1; lower extremity p < 0.001 with 72.2 and 50.9 versus 84.5 and 85.5). There were no significant differences on cancer worry, anxiety and depression were found between all groups. Conclusions: Based on this survivorship study, HRQoL in eSTS survivors treated with ILP followed by limb-sparing resection is not inferior to extended resections, however it is superior in maintenance of physical functioning and functionality compared to an amputation.[Table: see text]