Back to Search Start Over

Emotional Modulation of Attention: Fear Increases but Disgust Reduces the Attentional Blink

Authors :
Nicolas Vermeulen
Jimmy Godefroid
Martial Mermillod
UCL - PSP/PSP - Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation
Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (LPNC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 (UPMF)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, Vol 4, Iss 11, p e7924 (2009), PloS one, Vol. 4, no. 11, p. e7924 (2009), PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2009, 4 (11), pp.e7924. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0007924⟩
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2009.

Abstract

International audience; BACKGROUND: It is well known that facial expressions represent important social cues. In humans expressing facial emotion, fear may be configured to maximize sensory exposure (e.g., increases visual input) whereas disgust can reduce sensory exposure (e.g., decreases visual input). To investigate whether such effects also extend to the attentional system, we used the "attentional blink" (AB) paradigm. Many studies have documented that the second target (T2) of a pair is typically missed when presented within a time window of about 200-500 ms from the first to-be-detected target (T1; i.e., the AB effect). It has recently been proposed that the AB effect depends on the efficiency of a gating system which facilitates the entrance of relevant input into working memory, while inhibiting irrelevant input. Following the inhibitory response on post T1 distractors, prolonged inhibition of the subsequent T2 is observed. In the present study, we hypothesized that processing facial expressions of emotion would influence this attentional gating. Fearful faces would increase but disgust faces would decrease inhibition of the second target. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We showed that processing fearful versus disgust faces has different effects on these attentional processes. We found that processing fear faces impaired the detection of T2 to a greater extent than did the processing disgust faces. This finding implies emotion-specific modulation of attention. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the recent literature on attention, our finding suggests that processing fear-related stimuli exerts greater inhibitory responses on distractors relative to processing disgust-related stimuli. This finding is of particular interest for researchers examining the influence of emotional processing on attention and memory in both clinical and normal populations. For example, future research could extend upon the current study to examine whether inhibitory processes invoked by fear-related stimuli may be the mechanism underlying the enhanced learning of fear-related stimuli.

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ee61c7689f6a1ed56c8ebad7e64e206b