Back to Search Start Over

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection

Authors :
Pauline Robert
Jérôme Auzanneau
Ellen Goudemand
François-Xavier Oury
Bernard Rolland
Emmanuel Heumez
Sophie Bouchet
Jacques Le Gouis
Renaud Rincent
Génétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon (Génétique Végétale) (GQE-Le Moulon)
AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Génétique Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales (GDEC)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Agri-obtention (AO)
florimont desprez
Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes (IGEPP)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Rennes Angers
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Unité Expérimentale Grandes Cultures Innovation Environnement - Picardie (GCIE)
Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
ANRT 2019/0060
Source :
TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2022, 135 (3), pp.895-914. ⟨10.1007/s00122-021-04005-8⟩
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022.

Abstract

International audience; Phenomic selection is a promising alternative or complement to genomic selection in wheat breeding. Models combining spectra from different environments maximise the predictive ability of grain yield and heading date of wheat breeding lines. Phenomic selection (PS) is a recent breeding approach similar to genomic selection (GS) except that genotyping is replaced by near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. PS can potentially account for non-additive effects and has the major advantage of being low cost and high throughput. Factors influencing GS predictive abilities have been intensively studied, but little is known about PS. We tested and compared the abilities of PS and GS to predict grain yield and heading date from several datasets of bread wheat lines corresponding to the first or second years of trial evaluation from two breeding companies and one research institute in France. We evaluated several factors affecting PS predictive abilities including the possibility of combining spectra collected in different environments. A simple H-BLUP model predicted both traits with prediction ability from 0.26 to 0.62 and with an efficient computation time. Our results showed that the environments in which lines are grown had a crucial impact on predictive ability based on the spectra acquired and was specific to the trait considered. Models combining NIR spectra from different environments were the best PS models and were at least as accurate as GS in most of the datasets. Furthermore, a GH-BLUP model combining genotyping and NIR spectra was the best model of all (prediction ability from 0.31 to 0.73). We demonstrated also that as for GS, the size and the composition of the training set have a crucial impact on predictive ability. PS could therefore replace or complement GS for efficient wheat breeding programs.

Details

ISSN :
14322242 and 00405752
Volume :
135
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ee2d8c75382972c20b41a324b2fb0d55