Back to Search Start Over

Rippling of graphitic surfaces: A comparison between few-layer graphene and HOPG

Rippling of graphitic surfaces: A comparison between few-layer graphene and HOPG

Authors :
Vaidotas Miseikis
Niloofar Haghighian
Francesco Bisio
Alberto Morgante
Camilla Coletti
Domenica Convertino
Ornella Cavalleri
Maurizio Canepa
Haghighian, N.
Convertino, D.
Miseikis, V.
Bisio, F.
Morgante, A.
Coletti, C.
Canepa, Maurizio
Cavalleri, Ornella
Source :
PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics, 20 (2018): 13322–13330. doi:10.1039/c8cp01039k, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Haghighian N.; Convertino D.; Miseikis V.; Bisio F.; Morgante A.; Coletti C.; Canepa M.; Cavalleri O./titolo:Rippling of graphitic surfaces: A comparison between few-layer graphene and HOPG/doi:10.1039%2Fc8cp01039k/rivista:PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics (Print)/anno:2018/pagina_da:13322/pagina_a:13330/intervallo_pagine:13322–13330/volume:20
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The surface structure of Few-Layer Graphene (FLG) epitaxially grown on the C-face of SiC has been investigated by TM-AFM in ambient air and upon interaction with dilute aqueous solutions of bioorganic molecules (L-methionine and dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO). Before interaction with molecular solutions, we observe nicely ordered, three-fold oriented rippled domains, with a 4.7 +/- 0.2 nm periodicity (small periodicity, SP) and a peak-to-valley distance in the range 0.1-0.2 nm. Upon mild interaction with the molecular solution, the ripple periodicity `` relaxes'' to 6.2 +/- 0.2 nm (large periodicity, LP), while the peak-to-valley height increases to 0.2-0.3 nm. When additional energy is transferred to the system through sonication in solution, graphene planes are peeled off, as shown by quantitative analysis of Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy which indicate a neat reduction of thickness. Upon exfoliation rippled domains are no longer observed. In comparative experiments on cleaved HOPG, we could not observe ripples on pristine samples in ambient air, while LP ripples develop upon interaction with the molecular solutions. Recent literature on similar systems is not univocal regarding the interpretation of rippling. The ensemble of our comparative observations on FLG and HOPG can be hardly rationalized solely on the basis of the surface assembly of molecules, either organic molecules coming from the solution or adventitious species. We propose to consider rippling as the manifestation of the free-energy minimization of quasi-2D layers, eventually affected by factors such as interplanar stacking, and interactions with molecules and/or with the AFM tip.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics, 20 (2018): 13322–13330. doi:10.1039/c8cp01039k, info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Haghighian N.; Convertino D.; Miseikis V.; Bisio F.; Morgante A.; Coletti C.; Canepa M.; Cavalleri O./titolo:Rippling of graphitic surfaces: A comparison between few-layer graphene and HOPG/doi:10.1039%2Fc8cp01039k/rivista:PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics (Print)/anno:2018/pagina_da:13322/pagina_a:13330/intervallo_pagine:13322–13330/volume:20
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ed00d0070990bac6e0af1f5df02cbdf1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01039k