Back to Search Start Over

Is anoplasty superior to scar revision surgery for post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis? Six years of experience

Authors :
Yu-Tse, Weng
Kuan-Jung, Chu
Kuan-Hsun, Lin
Chun-Kai, Chang
Jung-Cheng, Kang
Chao-Yang, Chen
Je-Ming, Hu
Ta-Wei, Pu
Source :
World Journal of Clinical Cases. 10:7698-7707
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc., 2022.

Abstract

Anal stenosis is a rare but frustrating condition that usually occurs as a complication of hemorrhoidectomy. The severity of anal stenosis can be classified into three categories: mild, moderate, and severe. There are two main surgical treatments for this condition: scar revision surgery and anoplasty; however, no studies have compared these two approaches, and it remains unclear which is preferrable for stenoses of different severities.To compare the outcomes of scar revision surgery and double diamond-shaped flap anoplasty.Patients with mild, moderate, or severe anal stenosis following hemorrhoidectomy procedures who were treated with either scar revision surgery or double diamond-shaped flap anoplasty at our institution between January 2010 and December 2015 were investigated and compared. The severity of stenosis was determinedWe analyzed 60 consecutive patients, including 36 men (60%) and 24 women (40%). The mean operative time for scar revision surgery was significantly shorter than that for double diamond-shaped flap anoplasty (10.14 ± 2.31 [range: 7-15] minScar revision surgery may be preferable for mild anal stenosis upon conservative treatment failure. Anoplasty is unavoidable for moderate or severe stenosis, where cicatrized tissue is extensive.

Subjects

Subjects :
General Medicine

Details

ISSN :
23078960
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World Journal of Clinical Cases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ecbf04020549466ae956b1354d06ef6e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698