Back to Search Start Over

RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations

Authors :
Joshua M. Rosenow
John E. Kirsch
Laleh Golestanirad
Jasmine Vu
Stella Lin
Ehsan Kazemivalipour
Ergin Atalar
Behzad Elahi
Bhumi Bhusal
Bach T. Nguyen
Kazemivalipour, Ehsan
Atalar, Ergin
Source :
EMBC, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
IEEE, 2020.

Abstract

Date of Conference: 20-24 July 2020 Conference Name: 42nd Annual International Conferences of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2020 Patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants are often denied access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to safety concerns associated with RF heating of implants. Although MR-conditional DBS devices are available, complying with manufacturer guidelines has proved to be difficult as pulse sequences that optimally visualize DBS target structures tend to have much higher specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy than current guidelines allow. The MR-labeling of DBS devices, as well as the majority of studies on RF heating of conductive implants have been limited to horizontal close-bore MRI scanners. Vertical MRI scanners, originally introduced as open low-field MRI systems, are now available at 1.2 T field strength, capable of high-resolution structural and functional imaging. No literature exists on DBS SAR in this class of scanners which have a 90° rotated transmit coil and thus, generate a fundamentally different electric and magnetic field distributions. Here we present a simulation study of RF heating in a cohort of forty patient-derived DBS lead models during MRI in a commercially available vertical openbore MRI system (1.2 T OASIS, Hitachi) and a standard horizontal 1.5 T birdcage coil. Simulations were performed at two major imaging landmarks representing head and chest imaging. We calculated the maximum of 0.1g-averaged SAR (0.1g-SAR Max ) around DBS lead tips when a B 1 + = 4 μT was generated on an axial plane passing through patients body. For head landmark, 0.1g-SAR Max reached 220±188 W/kg in the 1.5 T birdcage coil, but only 14±11 W/kg in the OASIS coil. For chest landmark, 0.1g-SAR Max was 24±17 W/kg in the 1.5 T birdcage coil and 3±2 W/kg in the OASIS coil. A paired two-tail t-test revealed a significant reduction in SAR with a large effect-size during head MRI (p

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ec8e7ad2098626b816bcf3b2f90483ed