Back to Search Start Over

Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM)

Authors :
Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont
Helmuth Steinmetz
Charlotte Schubert
Caspar Brekenfeld
Özgür A. Onur
Sven Poli
Moriz Herzberg
Christopher E J Doppler
Annerose Mengel
Waltraud Pfeilschifter
Peter A. Ringleb
Ansgar Berlis
Michael Ertl
Luzie Köhler
Anna Alegiani
Philipp Zickler
Laurent M. Willems
Tanja Manser
Peter Scholz
Ferdinand O Bohmann
Heike Rai
Eva Herrmann
Katharina Gruber
Lars Kellert
Frank A. Wollenweber
Johannes Pfaff
Christoph Kabbasch
Natalia Kurka
Simon Nagel
Karl Georg Haeusler
Source :
European journal of neurologyREFERENCES. 29(1)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND The objective of the STREAM Trial was to evaluate the effect of simulation training on process times in acute stroke care. METHODS The multicenter prospective interventional STREAM Trial was conducted between 10/2017 and 04/2019 at seven tertiary care neurocenters in Germany with a pre- and post-interventional observation phase. We recorded patient characteristics, acute stroke care process times, stroke team composition and simulation experience for consecutive direct-to-center patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT). The intervention consisted of a composite intervention centered around stroke-specific in situ simulation training. Primary outcome measure was the 'door-to-needle' time (DTN) for IVT. Secondary outcome measures included process times of EVT and measures taken to streamline the pre-existing treatment algorithm. RESULTS The effect of the STREAM intervention on the process times of all acute stroke operations was neutral. However, secondary analyses showed a DTN reduction of 5 min from 38 min pre-intervention (interquartile range [IQR] 25-43 min) to 33 min (IQR 23-39 min, p = 0.03) post-intervention achieved by simulation-experienced stroke teams. Concerning EVT, we found significantly shorter door-to-groin times in patients who were treated by teams with simulation experience as compared to simulation-naive teams in the post-interventional phase (-21 min, simulation-naive: 95 min, IQR 69-111 vs. simulation-experienced: 74 min, IQR 51-92, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION An intervention combining workflow refinement and simulation-based stroke team training has the potential to improve process times in acute stroke care.

Details

ISSN :
14681331
Volume :
29
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European journal of neurologyREFERENCES
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ebedfb8562953f7b32bd40518772f000