Back to Search Start Over

Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: ADVICE (Actual Data of Vomiting Incidence by Chemotherapy Evaluation) study

Authors :
Y. Escobar
Juan Carlos Adansa
Maria Jose Lecumberri
Pablo Luna
Begoña Muros
Jaime Feliu
Gerardo Cajaraville
Ana Blasco
M.V. Tornamira
Patricia del Barrio
María José Martínez
Pere Gascón
Rosa Alvarez
Virginia Calvo
Olatz Olariaga
Andrés Muñoz
Rafael López
María José Tamés
Joaquín Montalar
Juan Antonio Virizuela
Purificación Martínez
Source :
Supportive Care in Cancer, Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, r-IIS La Fe. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, instname
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the incidence of nausea and vomiting (CINV) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), under medical practice conditions and the accuracy with which physicians perceive CINV. Chemotherapy-naive patients receiving MEC between April 2012 and May 2013 were included. Patients completed a diary of the intensity of nausea and number of vomiting episodes. Complete response and complete protection were assessed as secondary endpoints. Of 261 patients included, 240 were evaluated. Median age was 64 years, 44.2 % were female and 11.2 % were aged less than 50 years; 95.3 % of patients received a combination of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonist + corticosteroid as antiemetic treatment. Vomiting within 5 days of chemotherapy administration occurred in 20.8 %, nausea in 42 % and significant nausea in 23.8 % of patients. An increase in the percentage of patients with significant nausea (from 9.4 to 21.7 %) and vomiting (from 9.2 to 16.5 %) was observed from the acute to the delayed phase. Complete response was 84.2 % in the acute phase, 77 % in the late phase and 68.9 % in overall period. Complete protection was 79.5 % in the acute phase, 68.8 % in the late phase and 62.4 % throughout the study period. Physicians estimated prophylaxis would be effective for 75 % of patients receiving MEC, compared with 54.1 % obtained from patients' diary. Despite receiving prophylactic treatment, 31 % of patients did not achieve a complete response and 38 % complete protection. In general, nausea was worse controlled than vomiting. The results also showed the late phase was worse controlled than the acute phase in all variables. Healthcare providers overestimated the effectiveness of antiemetic prophylaxis.<br />All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. The research has been funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD). Merck Sharp & Dohme Spain-a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA-provided Financial Support for the conduct of the study.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14337339 and 09414355
Volume :
23
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Supportive Care in Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ebb0eb5235bc9e6c87c8a22195d2a536