Back to Search Start Over

Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction

Authors :
Simon Redwood
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Sebastian Ludwig
Pablo Codner
David A. Wood
Franz J. Neumann
Martin Andreas
Marco Barbanti
Matjaz Bunc
Fausto Castriota
Won-Keun Kim
Leonardo Guimaraes
Baravan Al-Kassou
Abdullah Alkhodair
Jonathon Leipsic
Nicolo Piazza
Ran Kornowski
Horst Sievert
John Lisko
Lisa Crusius
Philipp Ruile
Ronen Jaffe
Kolja Sievert
Uri Landes
Gidon Y. Perlman
Tamim Nazif
Antonio Colombo
Niklas Schofer
Matteo Montorfano
Roberto Nerla
Mika Laine
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Azeem Latib
Corrado Tamburino
Susheel Kodali
Didier Tchetche
Mark Hensey
Taishi Okuno
Mayra Guerrero
Maarten P van Wiechen
Antonio Mangieri
Amnon Eitan
Vasilis C. Babaliaros
Martin B. Leon
Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
Thomas Pilgrim
Chiara Fraccaro
Giuseppe Tarantini
Hind Alosaimi
Ole De Backer
Luis Nombela-Franco
Federico De Marco
Lars Søndergaard
Christian W. Hamm
Ariel Finkelstein
Jan Malte Sinning
Haim D. Danenberg
Wolfgang Schoels
John G. Webb
Claudia Fiorina
David Hildick-Smith
Hélène Eltchaninoff
Guy Witberg
Philipp Blanke
Rebecca Govdfrey
Alfonso Ielasi
Janarthanan Sathananthan
Abdallah El Sabbagh
Itamar Loewenstein
Lisa Voigtlaender
Marco Russo
Matthias Kullmer
Nicola Buzzatti
Cardiology
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 75(16), 1882-1893. Elsevier Inc.
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) use is increasing in patients with longer life expectancy, yet robust data on the durability of transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are limited. Redo-TAVR may play a key strategy in treating patients in whom THVs fail. Objectives The authors sought to examine outcomes following redo-TAVR. Methods The Redo-TAVR registry collected data on consecutive patients who underwent redo-TAVR at 37 centers. Patients were classified as probable TAVR failure or probable THV failure if they presented within or beyond 1 year of their index TAVR, respectively. Results Among 63,876 TAVR procedures, 212 consecutive redo-TAVR procedures were identified (0.33%): 74 within and 138 beyond 1 year of the initial procedure. For these 2 groups, TAVR-to-redo-TAVR time was 68 (38 to 154) days and 5 (3 to 6) years. The indication for redo-TAVR was THV stenosis in 12 (16.2%) and 51 (37.0%) (p = 0.002) and regurgitation or combined stenosis–regurgitation in 62 (83.8%) and 86 (62.3%) (p = 0.028), respectively. Device success using VARC-2 criteria was achieved in 180 patients (85.1%); most failures were attributable to high residual gradients (14.1%) or regurgitation (8.9%). At 30-day and 1-year follow-up, residual gradients were 12.6 ± 7.5 mm Hg and 12.9 ± 9.0 mm Hg; valve area 1.63 ± 0.61 cm2 and 1.51 ± 0.57 cm2; and regurgitation ≤mild in 91% and 91%, respectively. Peri-procedural complication rates were low (3 stroke [1.4%], 7 valve malposition [3.3%], 2 coronary obstruction [0.9%], 20 new permanent pacemaker [9.6%], no mortality), and symptomatic improvement was substantial. Survival at 30 days was 94.6% and 98.5% (p = 0.101) and 83.6% and 88.3% (p = 0.335) at 1 year for patients presenting with early and late valve dysfunction, respectively. Conclusions Redo-TAVR is a relatively safe and effective option for selected patients with valve dysfunction after TAVR. These results are important for applicability of TAVR in patients with long life expectancy in whom THV durability may be a concern.

Details

ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
75
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....eb49147db53fa25e434b2f8e0e36f745