Back to Search Start Over

Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique

Authors :
Sjoerd te Slaa
Frank Verver
Tymour Forouzanfar
Jan Wolff
Angela Ridwan-Pramana
Sander Idema
Saskia M. Peerdeman
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Oral Pathology
Neurosurgery
Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Restoration and Development
IOO
Maxillofacial Surgery (VUmc)
Source :
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(2), 408-411. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(2), 408-411. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Ridwan-Pramana, A, Idema, S, Te Slaa, S, Verver, F, Wolff, J, Forouzanfar, T & Peerdeman, S 2019, ' Polymethyl methacrylate in patient-specific implants : Description of a new three-dimension technique ', The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 408-411 . https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005148, Ridwan-Pramana, A, Idema, S, te Slaa, S, Verver, F, Wolff, J, Forouzanfar, T & Peerdeman, S 2019, ' Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique ', Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 408-411 . https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005148
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), an easily moldable and economical synthetic resin, has been used since the 1940s. In addition, PMMA has good mechanical properties and is one of the most biocompatible alloplastic materials currently available. The PMMA can serve as a spacer and as a delivery vehicle for antibiotics. Prior studies have indicated that no significant differences in infection rates exist between autologous and acrylic cranioplasty. Although inexpensive, the free-hand cranioplasty technique often yields unsatisfactory cosmetic results. In the present study, the application of a recently developed, economic modality for the perioperative application, and molding of PMMA to ensure a precise fit in 16 patients using computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing, and rapid prototyping was described.The mean defect size was 102.0 ± 26.4 cm. The mean volume of PMMA required to perform the cranioplasty procedure was 51 mL. The cost of PMMA was approximately 6 Euro (&OV0556;) per mL. The costs of fabricating the implants varied from 119.8 &OV0556; to 1632.0 &OV0556; with a mean of 326.4 &OV0556; ± 371.6. None of the implants required removal during the follow-up period.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10492275
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(2), 408-411. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(2), 408-411. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Ridwan-Pramana, A, Idema, S, Te Slaa, S, Verver, F, Wolff, J, Forouzanfar, T & Peerdeman, S 2019, ' Polymethyl methacrylate in patient-specific implants : Description of a new three-dimension technique ', The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 408-411 . https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005148, Ridwan-Pramana, A, Idema, S, te Slaa, S, Verver, F, Wolff, J, Forouzanfar, T & Peerdeman, S 2019, ' Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique ', Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 408-411 . https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005148
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....eb39b58fc42b71cf2a83001124bc7858
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005148