Back to Search Start Over

Recurrent implantation failure: how common is it?

Authors :
Jean Marc Ayoubi
Paul Pirtea
Richard T. Scott
Dominique de Ziegler
Source :
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 33:207-212
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW To clarify a lingering issue, the true incidence of repeated implantation failures (RIF) in women undergoing successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SET). RECENT FINDINGS As not all Assisted reproductive techinique (ART) attempts are crowned by success, it has been questioned since incept of ART whether failures resulted from an embryonic or endometrial cause. RIF has received no precise definition but a trend has existed toward setting a more stringent definition, as reproductive biology has become more effective and ART success rates improved. No scientific society has yet convened on a universally accepted definition. The advent of effective and well tolerated pregestational testing of embryos for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has allowed to not transfer aneuploid embryos, which are bound not to succeed. This, therefore, justify revisiting the concept of RIF when only euploid embryos are transferred. SUMMARY Contrary to lingering beliefs, the results of our study indicate that RIF following three successive euploid embryo transfers in a morphologically normal endometrium is a rare occurrence (

Details

ISSN :
1473656X and 1040872X
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....eb109302b4e8a6962aaeca67686ec26c