Back to Search
Start Over
Recurrent implantation failure: how common is it?
- Source :
- Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 33:207-212
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021.
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE OF REVIEW To clarify a lingering issue, the true incidence of repeated implantation failures (RIF) in women undergoing successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SET). RECENT FINDINGS As not all Assisted reproductive techinique (ART) attempts are crowned by success, it has been questioned since incept of ART whether failures resulted from an embryonic or endometrial cause. RIF has received no precise definition but a trend has existed toward setting a more stringent definition, as reproductive biology has become more effective and ART success rates improved. No scientific society has yet convened on a universally accepted definition. The advent of effective and well tolerated pregestational testing of embryos for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has allowed to not transfer aneuploid embryos, which are bound not to succeed. This, therefore, justify revisiting the concept of RIF when only euploid embryos are transferred. SUMMARY Contrary to lingering beliefs, the results of our study indicate that RIF following three successive euploid embryo transfers in a morphologically normal endometrium is a rare occurrence (
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Pregnancy Rate
Aneuploidy
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Implantation failure
Pregnancy
medicine
Humans
Embryo Implantation
Intensive care medicine
Scientific society
Retrospective Studies
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
business.industry
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Normal endometrium
Embryo Transfer
medicine.disease
Embryo transfer
Pregnancy rate
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
embryonic structures
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1473656X and 1040872X
- Volume :
- 33
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....eb109302b4e8a6962aaeca67686ec26c