Back to Search Start Over

Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds

Authors :
Yann Dujardin
Estelle Midler
Ignacio Palomo
María José Sanz
Unai Pascual
Manon Robin
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3)
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM)
UAR1203 DEPT MIA Département Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Osnabrück University
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques de Bordeaux-Aquitaine (Bordeaux Sciences Agro)
Ikerbasque - Basque Foundation for Science
University of Bern
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness : IJCI-2016-28475
Basque Centre for Climate Change 'Unit of Excellence' (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) : MDM-2017-0714
Source :
Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, instname, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116 (45), pp.22645-22650. ⟨10.1073/pnas.1908683116⟩, Addi: Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación, Universidad del País Vasco
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options. (c) 2019 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. I.P. is supported by a grant by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (IJCI-2016–28475). I.P., U.P., and M.J.S. are supported under the Basque Centre for Climate Change “Unit of Excellence” (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness; MDM-2017-0714).

Details

ISSN :
10916490 and 00278424
Volume :
116
Issue :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ead6b59f2438735f83450ea4fd7c3ced
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908683116⟩