Back to Search
Start Over
TWO CASES OF URETHRAL PROLAPSE MISDIAGNOSED AS PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
- Source :
- The Japanese Journal of Urology. 110:219-222
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Japanese Urological Association, 2019.
-
Abstract
- We experienced two cases of urethral prolapse misdiagnosed as pelvic organ prolapse. One patient, an 87-year-old woman, was referred to us from a gynecological clinic with a supposed uterine prolapse. The other patient, an 84-year-old woman, was referred to us from the Department of Urology in a general hospital with a supposed recurrence of cystocele following a transvaginal mesh repair. We diagnosed both of them as having a urethral prolapse through pelvic examination and cystoscopy. Both patients were treated uneventfully with the four-quadrant excisional technique. Urethral prolapse is a relatively rare disease and as such, urologists and gynecologists may have little exposure to the symptoms in a clinical setting, resulting to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. We discussed the differential diagnosis of urethral prolapse.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Pelvic organ
Mesh repair
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Urology
030232 urology & nephrology
Uterine prolapse
Cystoscopy
Urethral Prolapse
medicine.disease
Surgery
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
medicine
Differential diagnosis
business
Pelvic examination
Rare disease
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18847110 and 00215287
- Volume :
- 110
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Japanese Journal of Urology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....eaae5868dcdc78efadc8f797544296ba