Back to Search Start Over

Results of crossover phase II component of randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating oral THC/cannabis extract for refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

Authors :
Stephen Della-Fiorentina
Anna Walsh
Craig Gedye
Paul S. Haber
Martin R. Stockler
E Abdi
Annette Tognela
Karen Briscoe
Iain S. McGregor
Adrienne Kirby
Ian N. Olver
Stephen Clarke
John Simes
Yvonne Cheung
Peter Fox
Rachael L. Morton
Antony Mersiades
Morteza Aghmesheh
Peter Grimison
Nicholas Lintzeris
Source :
Web of Science
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2020.

Abstract

12008 Background: The aim of this multi-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial is to determine efficacy of addition of oral cannabis in adults with any malignancy of any stage, experiencing CINV during moderate-highly emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy, despite guideline-consistent anti-emetic prophylaxis, requiring ≥ 2 chemotherapy cycles. Here we report the crossover phase 2 component results. Methods: Treatment consisted of 1 cycle of oral THC 2.5mg/CBD 2.5mg (TN-TC11M) capsules tds days -1 to 5 and 1 cycle matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a 3rd cycle. Primary end-point is difference in proportion of patients with ‘complete response’ (no emesis & no use of rescue medications) during 0-120 hours from chemotherapy between cycles. 80 patients provides 80% power with 2p of 0.1 to detect a 20% difference. Results: 81 patients recruited (2016-9). 72 completing 2 cycles are included in efficacy analyses. 78 not withdrawing consent are included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80), 78% were female, 42% report historic cannabis use, 55% were treated with curative intent. Most common regimens were AC (26%), FOLFOX (17%). All received steroids & 5-HT3 antagonist, 79% received NK-1 antagonist, 4% received olanzapine. Efficacy is shown in table. 83% preferred cannabis to placebo. Most common bothersome cannabinoid-related adverse events (cannabis, placebo) were sedation (19%,4%), dizziness (10%,1%), disorientation (3%,0%). No SAEs were attributed to THC/CBD. Conclusions: Addition of oral THC/CBD to standard anti-emetics was associated with less nausea & vomiting but additional side effects. Most preferred THC/CBD to placebo. Based on these positive results, the definitive parallel phase 3 trial component continues (additional n=170). Acknowledgements: Trial participants, investigators, research staff. Funding from NSW Government Dept of Health. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12616001036404 . [Table: see text]

Details

ISSN :
15277755, 0732183X, and 12616001
Volume :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ea1f60bef1fb7c8ce04ffd7e75b6fef6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.12008