Back to Search Start Over

A Randomized Trial of Two Coverage Targets for Mass Treatment with Azithromycin for Trachoma

Authors :
Travis C. Porco
Thomas C. Quinn
Robin L. Bailey
Tansy Edwards
Thomas M. Lietman
Beatriz Munoz
Charlotte A. Gaydos
Harran Mkocha
David Mabey
Sheila K. West
Source :
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Lietman, Thomas; Porco, Travis; West, SK; Bailey, R; Munoz, B; Edwards, T; et al.(2013). A Randomized Trial of Two Coverage Targets for Mass Treatment with Azithromycin for Trachoma. UC San Francisco: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7z29n92g, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 7, Iss 8, p e2415 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, 2013.

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization recommends at least 3 annual antibiotic mass drug administrations (MDA) where the prevalence of trachoma is >10% in children ages 1–9 years, with coverage at least at 80%. However, the additional value of higher coverage targeted at children with multiple rounds is unknown. Trial Design 2×2 factorial community randomized, double blind, trial. Trial methods 32 communities with prevalence of trachoma ≥20% were randomized to: annual MDA aiming for coverage of children between 80%–90% (usual target) versus aiming for coverage>90% (enhanced target); and to: MDA for three years versus a rule of cessation of MDA early if the estimated prevalence of ocular C. trachomatis infection was less than 5%. The primary outcome was the community prevalence of infection with C. trachomatis at 36 months. Results Over the trial's course, no community met the MDA cessation rule, so all communities had the full 3 rounds of MDA. At 36 months, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of infection, 4.0 versus 5.4 (mean adjusted difference = 1.4%, 95% CI = −1.0% to 3.8%), nor in the prevalence of trachoma, 6.1 versus 9.0 (mean adjusted difference = 2.6%, 95% CI = −0.3% to 5.3%) comparing the usual target to the enhanced target group. There was no difference if analyzed using coverage as a continuous variable. Conclusion In communities that had pre-treatment prevalence of follicular trachoma of 20% or greater, there is no evidence that MDA can be stopped before 3 annual rounds, even with high coverage. Increasing coverage in children above 90% does not appear to confer additional benefit.<br />Author Summary The World Health Organization recommends at least 3 annual antibiotic mass drug administrations (MDA) where the prevalence of trachoma is >10% in children ages 1–9 years, with coverage at least at 80%. However, the additional value of higher coverage targeted at children with multiple rounds is unknown. We randomized 32 communities in Kongwa, Tanzania, with starting prevalence estimated at >20% to four arms: annual MDA aiming for coverage of children between 80%–90% (usual target) versus aiming for coverage>90% (enhanced target); and to: MDA for three years versus a rule of cessation of MDA early if the estimated prevalence of ocular C. trachomatis infection was less than 5%. After three rounds of MDA, infection with C. trachomatis and trachoma had declined significantly from baseline but no communities had treatment stopped. There was no difference in infection or in trachoma at three years comparing the usual coverage communities to the enhanced coverage communities. We conclude that in communities that had pre-treatment prevalence of follicular trachoma of 20% or greater, there is no evidence that MDA can be stopped before 3 annual rounds, even with high coverage. Increasing coverage in children above 90% does not appear to confer additional benefit.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19352735 and 19352727
Volume :
7
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e9a5fb0b9a8242133ce75443bf6e05e2