Back to Search
Start Over
Antipodal biosecurity? Oversight of dual use research in the United States and australia
- Source :
- Frontiers in Public Health, Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 2 (2014)
- Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- The creation of a virulent mousepox virus in Australia and publication of this experiment in 2001 are often argued to mark a dangerous turn in dual use research (1). After this experiment and – far more consequential – September 11 and the anthrax letters, the oversight of dual use research in the life sciences received considerable attention in the United States. We argue that the American experience provides valuable lessons for Australia, three of which are highlighted here. First, the international community is ill-equipped to govern the life sciences. Like the United States, Australia should therefore help itself through national regulations and oversight. Second, like most special interest groups, scientists prefer self-regulation. While this may be a practical solution for scientific publications, federally funded research warrants independent review as a condition of funding. Third, in order to provide independent review, oversight should be truly multidisciplinary, including social, political, and biological expertise. A multidisciplinary approach stands the best chance of balancing the risks and rewards of dual use research.
- Subjects :
- Operations research
business.industry
dual use research of concern
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
Biosecurity
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Australia
International community
lcsh:RA1-1270
Public relations
Special Interest Group
DUAL (cognitive architecture)
Opinion Article
World Health Organization
United States
Politics
Multidisciplinary approach
Order (exchange)
Medicine
Public Health
business
biosecurity
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 22962565
- Volume :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Frontiers in public health
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e95cc87cd3d7f5406c7816a76306c555