Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy on Serum Inhibin B Levels and Comparison with Classic Inguinal Orchiopexy

Authors :
Ugur Musabak
Ender Oral
Hasan Cem Irkilata
Yusuf Kibar
Ediz Yesilkaya
Murat Dayanc
Onder Ors
Source :
Urology. 72:525-529
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Inhibin B reveals Sertoli cell activity. After our previous findings of an increase in inhibin B succeeding classic inguinal orchiopexy, we sought to determine the changes in endocrine parameters after scrotal orchiopexy in patients with cryptorchidism and to compare these findings with the results of classic orchiopexy. METHODS A total of 50 boys with an undescended testis, 32 unilateral and 18 bilateral, were included in the present study. Scrotal orchiopexy was performed in all of them. Before and 6 months after orchiopexy, the serum basal inhibin B and other serum hormonal levels were measured in all patients. RESULTS The mean serum basal inhibin B levels had significantly increased and the other reproductive hormonal levels had not changed at 6 months after successful scrotal orchiopexy in our 50 patients (P = 0.016). Within the subgroups, the increase in inhibin B levels was significant in only those 2-9 years old with a unilateral undescended testis. The increase in inhibin B in those 10-12 years old with unilateral or bilateral undescended testis resulted from the start of puberty. No significant difference was found in terms of an increase in inhibin B after classic and scrotal orchiopexy. CONCLUSIONS The measurement of inhibin B levels could be used as a follow-up parameter after orchiopexy. The serum inhibin B level increases after scrotal incision orchiopexy just as after classic inguinal orchiopexy. The increased level of inhibin B might indicate that the orchiopexy has been beneficial.

Details

ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
72
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e8c6bc9acb1798b43e2a7301128a5088
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.063