Back to Search Start Over

Seroprevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific antibodies in Sydney after the first epidemic wave of 2020

Authors :
Kristine Macartney
Dorothy A Machalek
Hannah Shilling
Helen E. Quinn
Iain B Gosbell
Linda Hueston
Alexandra Hendry
John M. Kaldor
David O Irving
Dominic E. Dwyer
Marnie Downes
Kaitlyn Vette
Frank Beard
Heather F. Gidding
Matthew V. N. O'Sullivan
John B. Carlin
Rena Hirani
Source :
The Medical Journal of Australia
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2021.

Abstract

Objectives To estimate SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific antibody seroprevalence after the first epidemic wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in Sydney. Setting, participants People of any age who had provided blood for testing at selected diagnostic pathology services (general pathology); pregnant women aged 20–39 years who had received routine antenatal screening; and Australian Red Cross Lifeblood plasmapheresis donors aged 20–69 years. Design Cross‐sectional study; testing of de‐identified residual blood specimens collected during 20 April – 2 June 2020. Main outcome measure Estimated proportions of people seropositive for anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific IgG, adjusted for test sensitivity and specificity. Results Thirty‐eight of 5339 specimens were IgG‐positive (general pathology, 19 of 3231; antenatal screening, 7 of 560; plasmapheresis donors, 12 of 1548); there were no clear patterns by age group, sex, or location of residence. Adjusted estimated seroprevalence among people who had had general pathology blood tests (all ages) was 0.15% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.04–0.41%), and 0.29% (95% CrI, 0.04–0.75%) for plasmapheresis donors (20–69 years). Among 20–39‐year‐old people, the age group common to all three collection groups, adjusted estimated seroprevalence was 0.24% (95% CrI, 0.04–0.80%) for the general pathology group, 0.79% (95% CrI, 0.04–1.88%) for the antenatal screening group, and 0.69% (95% CrI, 0.04–1.59%) for plasmapheresis donors. Conclusions Estimated SARS‐CoV‐2 seroprevalence was below 1%, indicating that community transmission was low during the first COVID‐19 epidemic wave in Sydney. These findings suggest that early control of the spread of COVID‐19 was successful, but efforts to reduce further transmission remain important.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13265377 and 0025729X
Volume :
214
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Medical Journal of Australia
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e871792a97f719ab2fd6c0d0f70ce36f