Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study

Recently, the incidence of colorectal cancer has increased each year. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) removes the specimen from a natural cavity of the human body (anal or vaginal) and completes reconstruction of the digestive tract. There are only a few trocar scars in the abdomen after surgery. Transvaginal specimen extraction for right-sided colon cancer is one of the classic NOSES surgeries. As NOSES is accepted by increasing numbers of colorectal surgeons, NOSES technology is becoming increasingly widely used in China and abroad. Studies have confirmed the feasibility and safety of NOSES. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further clinical studies to evaluate the short-term efficacy of the NOSES procedure.To investigate the short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimens for laparoscopic right colon cancer (NOSES).We conducted a retrospective analysis of 90 cases of laparoscopic right colon cancer radical surgery performed continuously in the anorectal surgery of our Hospital from June 2015 to December 2018. Thirty-two patients underwent complete laparoscopic anastomosis and transvaginal specimen removal (NOSES group), and 58 patients underwent conventional abdominal wall removal specimen surgery (LAP group). The general data of the patients were matched by the propensity score matching (PSM) method 1:1. Thirty-one pairs of cases were successfully matched, and the intraoperative and postoperative data were analysed.After PSM, the baseline data were balanced between the two groups. A total of 62 patients in the two groups were successfully operated without conversion. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, lymph node dissection, sputum tumour cell positive rate, bacterial culture positive rate, postoperative follow-up and postoperative pelvic floor function evaluation (P 0.05). Neither tumour cells nor bacteria were detected in the rinse solution at the start of the operation. Compared with the LAP group, the incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the NOSES group (6.4% vs. 29.0%, P = 0.006), and the gastrointestinal function recovery time was shorter (2.58 ± 0.92 vs. 3.42 ± 0.92, P = 0.001), postoperative hospital stay was shorter (6.68 ± 1.47 vs. 9.58 ± 2.22, P 0.001), postoperative pain score was lower (postoperative day 1: 2.35 ± 1.52 vs. 4.87 ± 1.50; postoperative day 3: 1.81 ± 1.11 vs. 4.00 ± 1.18; postoperative day 5: 1.45 ± 1.00 vs. 2.97 ± 1.17; P 0.001), additional analgesic drug use rate was lower (12.9% vs. 61.3%, P 0.001), and patients were more satisfied with the appearance of the abdominal wall after surgery (100% vs. 23.6%, P 0.001).This study used PSM to remove confounding factors and retrospectively analysed the short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimens for laparoscopic right colon cancer radical resection. The results showed that the laparoscopic right colon cancer radical resection was satisfactory, ensuring sterility. At the same time, there is a clear advantage in reducing postoperative pain, shortening postoperative hospital stays, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and improving the appearance of the abdominal wall.